Extreme Representation.

Arizona’s Legislative District 6 (LD6) is populated by mostly moderate, sensible people. So Democratic Perspective asked, “Why is it represented in the state legislature by a trio of right wing extremists, otherwise known as Rep. Brenda Barton, Rep. Bob Thorpe and Sen. Chester Crandell?”

By all accounts, Barton actually lives in Stafford, which is outside the district. But she claims her cabin in Payson as her residence in order to qualify to represent the district. Thorpe is a leader of the Tea Party in Williams. And Crandell hails from Heber. All three posed as reasonable conservatives during the 2012 campaign. But once they arrived in the Statehouse, their true colors were exposed through a series of bills challenging the federal government and calling for nullification of federal laws. More recently, their extremism has been on display through Twitter.

For example, after US Attorney General Eric Holder announced sentencing reforms for drug possession crimes, Arizona State Rep. Bob Thorpe tweeted “Why is Holder now Soft on Crime? Perhaps: black = 12%-13% US population, but make up 40.1% (2.1 million) of male inmates in jail or prison.” When a colleague called the tweet racially offensive, Thorpe doubled down by tweeting “What’s Holder’s motivation for reversing extremely low crime rates? Could harm minorities the most!”

Not content with expressing those racist opinions, Thorpe tweeted his outrage that “three 15-year-old blacks” accused of beating up a white teenager received less notice by the “liberal press” than George Zimmerman. Other offensive tweets included “Obama freely gives money to Muslim Brotherhood, failing solar companies, but denies victims of Arizona Yarnell Fire …”

When Thorpe tweeted that the antics of the rodeo clown who wore a mask of President Obama at the Missouri State Fair were “crowd pleasing” he received such a negative reaction that he at least temporarily shut down his Twitter account. Barton’s tweet on the subject was no less offensive. She tweeted “I hope rodeo clowns this season all wear Obama masks in solidarity with the guy who lost his job because Barry’s hide is so thin…”

But it isn’t just his offensive tweets that have caused problems for Thorpe. He sponsored a bill that would require public high school students in Arizona to recite an oath supporting the US Constitution. In April, he was forced to cancel a sale of bulletproof vests in the state Capitol that he organized for other lawmakers. In May, he was forced to apologize when Republican colleagues received threatening messages after Thorpe asked constituents to contact Republicans who supported Medicaid expansion. And he backed a bill to prevent state enforcement of federally enacted gun safety laws that would clearly be unconstitutional if passed…a bill that was also sponsored by Barton.

Barton and Thorpe also sponsored a bill that would prohibit the federal government from implementing a health care exchange in Arizona.

And it’s not just the federal government that has Thorpe worried. He views Agenda 21, the nonbinding UN agreement signed by 178 nations that encourages sustainable and environmentally friendly practices, as a threat to US and, more important to Thorpe, Arizona sovereignty.

Not to be outdone, Barton sponsored a resolution encouraging a nuclear waste reprocessing facility in Northern Arizona. And Sen. Crandell authored a measure supported by Barton and Thorpe that would claim state sovereignty over all federal parks and forests in Arizona – 45 million acres.

Is this really the kind of representation we want for our district?

Posted in Anti-Federalism, Arizona Law Enforcement, Arizona Politics, Bigotry, Conservative Paranoia, Conservatives and Reactionaries, Constitutional Issues, Environment, Firearms Legislation, Government, Gun Control, Health Care, Local Politics, Sustainable Development | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Extreme Representation.

Democrats of the Red Rocks: a Conversation With the Founders — Podcast August 26, 2013


What Grassroots Means: Organizing Democrats in A Republican Town. Democratic Perspective co-hosts Mike Cosentino and Steve Williamson welcome Susan Solomon, Elizabeth Yancey, founding President and Vice-President, respectively of the Democrats of the Red Rocks (DORR) in Sedona, Arizona, together with Angela LeFevre, a past president of the organization and current member of the board, for a discussion of how DORR was founded, what its mission was and is, and how it has successfully contributed to the political development of our community and state.

Posted in Arizona Politics, Interviews, Local Politics, Podcasts, Political Clubs | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Democrats of the Red Rocks: a Conversation With the Founders — Podcast August 26, 2013

Arizona LD6: Are Republicans Really Getting What They Voted For? — Podcast August 19, 2013


Conservative Extremism in Arizona’s Legislative District 6: Democratic Perspective’s Mike Cosentino, Gary LaMaster and Steve Williamson examine the legislative records and public statements of the Republican state legislators representing LD6: State Senator Chester Crandell, and State Representatives Brenda Barton and Bob Thorpe. From their racist tweets to their sponsorship of anti-federal legislative proposals, they don’t appear to represent  the main stream of the Republican Party. Is this what the Republican voters of LD6 thought they were getting when they marked their ballots last November?

Posted in Anti-Federalism, Arizona Law Enforcement, Bigotry, Conservative Paranoia, Conservatives and Reactionaries, Conspiracy Theories, Constitutional Issues, Firearms Legislation, Founding Fathers, Government, Nullification, Podcasts, Political Gaffes, Political Lies | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Arizona LD6: Are Republicans Really Getting What They Voted For? — Podcast August 19, 2013

What You Should Know About Health Care And The Affordable Care Act.

On August 5 and August 12, Democratic Perspective tackled the very complicated subject of health care. We began by listing some statistics about the U.S. health care system. They’re anything but reassuring. For example:

In the U.S. we spend more than $2.7 trillion per year on health care. That represents more than $8,000 per person and almost 20 percent of GDP. The U.S. spends more than 4 times as much on health care as any other advanced nation with worse results. In addition, we spend almost as much on pharmaceuticals as all of the other nations combined.

Put another way, if the US health system was a country, it would be the 6th largest economy in the world! Yet, according to the most recent survey by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), the U.S. health system ranks 37th in effectiveness as measured by lifespan and responsiveness. We rank 34th in infant mortality, 26th in number of physicians, 29th for number of doctor consultations per capita and 28th for number of hospital beds per capita.

The skyrocketing cost of health care in the U.S. is being felt in virtually every aspect of our economy.

According to a report by United States Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. companies faced with higher health care costs reduce investments, raise prices, and lower employment. High health care costs also reduce the competitiveness of US firms in international markets. And workers who bear the cost of higher health care spending have less income to spend on other goods and services.

In fact, a report published in The American Journal of Medicine listed medical bills as a major factor in more than 60 percent of the personal bankruptcies in the United States. Amazingly, approximately 75 percent of those bankruptcies involved individuals that actually did have health insurance! About the only ones who aren’t suffering as a result of rising health care costs are health insurance companies, their executives and their lobbyists.

In 2009, at the height of the Great Recession, U.S. health insurance companies increased profits by 56 percent, ending the year with a combined profit of $12.2 billion. That same year, the top executives at the five largest for-profit health insurance companies in the United States combined to receive nearly $200 million in total compensation.

In 2010, the chairman of Aetna, the third largest health insurance company in the United States, brought home $68.7 million. And the CEO of United Health Group received $48.83 million in 2012, ranking eighth on Forbes’ list. Meanwhile, health care related businesses have spent $5.36 billion since 1998 on lobbying in Washington.

From all of this, it should be abundantly clear why something had to be done about our health care industry. That something is the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, aka Obamacare.

In most respects, Obamacare was the brainchild of the very conservative Heritage Foundation. It was first promoted during the 1996 presidential election by GOP candidate, Sen. Bob Dole as an alternative to the single-payer system that President Clinton had proposed early in his first term. An almost identical system was signed into law in Massachusetts by then Governor Mitt Romney.

Known as Romneycare, the Massachusetts system has seen employer-supported health coverage increase over the past 7 years. And a poll by WBUR, an NPR-affiliate in Boston, found that 62 percent of Massachusetts residents support Romneycare, while just 33 percent oppose it.

Obamacare is certainly not perfect, but it is a giant step in the right direction. Already, under Obamacare, lifetime limits on insurance coverage have been eliminated helping more than 105 million Americans. 3.1 million young adults under age 26 have gained insurance by being allowed to stay on their parents’ plans.

Obamacare has recovered $10.7 billion in Medicare fraud over the past 3 years. It has helped more than 6.3 million people on Medicare save $6.1 billion on prescription drugs since 2010 and, over the next 10 years, people with Medicare who hit the so-called prescription donut hole will save an average of more than $16,000. An estimated 34.1 million people with Medicare have received one or more free preventive service. Additionally, prevention coverage improved for approximately 54 million Americans through their private health insurance plans.

For the first time ever, insurance companies are required to justify increases in rates of 10 percent or more. 12.8 million Americans have already received a total of $1.1 billion in rebates from private insurers that failed to spend at least 80 percent of their premiums on healthcare. Finally, the life of the Medicare Trust Fund will be extended to at least 2024.

But that’s not the whole story.

CNNMoney reported that under Obamacare, insurance premiums in New York will drop by 50 percent. And Forbes Magazine reported that under Obamacare, Californians were in for a rate shock because premiums are a good deal less expensive than expected.

And contrary to the myths being perpetuated by the GOP, Obamacare will not use tax dollars to fund abortions. It will not lead to a government takeover of healthcare. Instead, it strengthens the existing employer-based health insurance market while making the market fair for consumers by implementing landmark consumer protections.

As previously noted, Obamacare will not raise the cost of healthcare insurance. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) found that health insurance reform will reduce the deficit by $210 billion in this decade and by more than $1 trillion over 10 years.

Obamacare will not make businesses suffer. The CBO found that it will lower health insurance premiums for the same insurance plan by up to 4 percent for small businesses and 3 percent for large businesses. (Estimates indicate that reform could save businesses $2,000 per person in health costs.) Obamacare will not cause employers to stop offering insurance to their workers, either. As already noted, under a similar system in Massachusetts, the percent of businesses offering insurance has increased.

Finally, Obamacare will not pay for healthcare for undocumented immigrants and it will not use taxpayer money to pay for abortions.

Want to learn more? Check out the March 4, 2013 Time Magazine cover article entitled “Bitter Pill” and the documentary “Escape Fire” which recently appeared on CNN. Or check out any of the following links:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/healthreform

http://www.forbes.com/sites/rickungar/2013/05/24/unexpected-health-insurance-rate-shock-california-obamacare-insurance-exchange-announces-premium-rates/

http://money.cnn.com/2013/07/17/news/economy/obamacare-health-insurance-new-york/index.html

http://www.uofmhealth.org/news/archive/201307/how-do-physicians-view-proposed-policies-cut-costs-health

http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/magazine/winter10assessment/

http://www.kaiserhealthnews.org/daily-reports/2013/july/24/docs-and-health-care-costs.aspx

http://www.forbes.com/sites/davechase/2012/10/05/escape-fire-artists-will-transform-healthcare/

CORRECTION:  On the August 12 show, my memory failed me.  I not only erroneously labeled Sen. Ben Nelson from Nebraska a Republican (He’s a Democrat). I said that he voted against the ACA (He in fact, provided the 60th vote after an amendment was added giving more Medicaid dollars to Nebraska. That provision did not become part of the final bill.) My apology for the errors.

Posted in Affordable Care Act, Economic Policy, Government, Health Care, Jobs and Employment, Medicare, National Politics | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on What You Should Know About Health Care And The Affordable Care Act.

The Affordable Health Care Act: What It Will Do For You Beginning in 2014 — Podcast August 12, 2013


Obamacare: The Best Is Yet to Come. Democratic Perspective’s Mike Cosentino, Gary LaMaster and Steve Williamson continue their review of the Affordable Health Care Act. What can we expect beginning next year? Lots of good stuff: restrictions on annual payout limits; free (no co-pay ) annual checkups and other free wellness and preventive medicine services; equal insurance costs for women; insurance exchanges where those not covered by employers can shop for a range of plans and providers without any confusing fine print, elimination of the Medicare doughnut hole, coverage for the self-employed who can’t currently get or afford coverage, and reduced insurance costs for all. Not bad for a piece of legislation that the Republican-controlled House of Representatives has tried to repeal some 40 times.

Posted in Affordable Care Act, Health Care, Medicaid, Medicare, National Politics, Podcasts | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The Affordable Health Care Act: What It Will Do For You Beginning in 2014 — Podcast August 12, 2013

A Realistic View Of US Foreign Policy In The Middle East.

On July 29, 2013, Democratic Perspective hosted Stephen M. Walt, professor of international affairs at Harvard University’s John F. Kennedy School of Government. Professor Walt is an author, a widely respected expert on foreign policy and a leading proponent of the realist approach to international affairs. He is co-author of the controversial book, The Israeli Lobby and US Foreign Policy, a review of the influence of Israel and its US lobbyists on US Middle Eastern policy.

We began the interview by asking how we can move peace forward in the Middle East.
He replied, “As valuable as it would be to have peace arrangements between the Israelis and the Palestinians after many decades and suffering on both sides, it’s a mistake to think that it is a master key that unlocks everything else.”

“If we magically got a peace deal tomorrow…that satisfied both sides reasonably well,” Walt continued, “It would have virtually no impact on what is going on in Syria. It would have relatively little impact on the struggle for power occurring in Egypt. It would not in the short term affect the conflicts between Sunni and Shia in Iraq or between Arabs in the Gulf and their concerns about Iran. It would some very positive effects for Israel and positive effects for the Palestinians. It would certainly go a long way in removing one of the sources of anti-Americanism in that region. But there are lots of other problems in that part of the world that would not be directly affected by even something as wonderful as an Israeli-Palestinian peace deal.”

We then asked what Secretary of State John Kerry should be doing as far as the peace process is concerned.

Walt responded, “The most important thing that Kerry has said, and he’s said this a number of times now, is that the window for some kind of two-state solution is closing, and some people believe that it’s already closed. He’s basically saying we have a year or two that we might be able to do something. For many years that’s been seen as the least bad alternative to finally resolve this lengthy conflict…the creation of a Palestinian state on virtually all of the West Bank and Gaza, and the establishment of secure borders for these two countries. He’s saying that, given all of the trends, if this doesn’t happen soon, it’s not going to happen ever. We’ll have to start thinking of alternatives and most of those alternatives look much worse. What’s missing, as near as we can tell from the outside, is anything that looks like a significantly different American approach to the problem.”
“There’s no sign that the United States is either going to propose a plan of its own or use its leverage with both sides, not just one, to try and force a deal,” said Walt.

When asked how US support is bad for Israel, Walt said, “I think the most obvious example of this is that the US has turned a blind eye to the Israeli settlements since 1967.”

“It has been the official policy of the US government, going all the way back to Lyndon Johnson, to oppose the construction of Israeli settlements on the West Bank territories that were conquered during the Six-Day War…we have said repeatedly these settlements are an obstacle to peace. Some American presidents have said it’s illegal. But the United States has never done anything concrete to actually stop them,” he added.

“In fact, given that we give Israel between $3 and $4 billion a year, we are, in effect, directly subsidizing them. And we’re also providing some diplomatic protection by vetoing UN Security Council resolutions that are critical of this policy. The danger here is that it has allowed Israel to continue to establish the settlements. There are now over a half million people living outside the original 1967 border. And this has created a situation where a two-state solution may now be impossible. And it’s also made it impossible to be simultaneously democratic and a Zionist state because, if you look down the road, eventually there may be more Arabs than Jews living there. This may be the single most serious threat to Israel’s future. And the United States has essentially been the enabler of this policy even though we opposed it,” Walt stated.

You can hear more of Walt’s observations about US foreign policy and the Middle East by listening to the entire interview on the podcast below.

Posted in Foreign Affairs, Foreign Policy, Government, International Relations, Middle East, Middle East Policy, Palestinian/Israeli Conflict | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on A Realistic View Of US Foreign Policy In The Middle East.

The Affordable Health Care Act: What It’s ALREADY Done For You — Podcast August 5, 2013


Obamacare: What Does the Evidence Tell Us? Democratic Perspective’s Mike Cosentino, Gary LaMaster and Steve Williamson review the Affordable Health Care Act. Not only are the pieces of the ACA already in effect working out better than expected, but the evidence from states which are already in the advanced planning stages prior to its full implementation in 2014 suggests that it will indeed cover more people, be even more affordable than predicted, and save money on both medicare and prescription costs. Republicans who are still trying to repeal it are looking more mean-spirited — and more foolish — every day.

Posted in Affordable Care Act, Health Care, Medicaid, Medicare, Podcasts | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on The Affordable Health Care Act: What It’s ALREADY Done For You — Podcast August 5, 2013

Stephen M. Walt Interview — Podcast July 29, 2013


American Foreign Policy in the Middle East: What Are the Prospects for Success? Democratic Perspective’s co-hosts Mike Cosentino and Steve Williamson interview Stephen M. Walt, professor of international affairs at Harvard University’s John F. Kennedy School of Government about U.S. Foreign Policy and the Middle East. Professor Walt is a widely respected expert on foreign policy, whose books The Origins of Alliance and Revolution and War have become standards in the field.

He is also the co-author, with John J. Mearsheimer, professor of political science at the University of Chicago, of The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy, a review of the influence of Israel and its U.S. lobbyists on U.S. Middle Eastern policy, published in 2007, which has since caused a significant controversy world-wide.

Posted in Foreign Affairs, Foreign Policy, Interviews, Military Policy, Palestinian/Israeli Conflict, Podcasts | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Stephen M. Walt Interview — Podcast July 29, 2013

Immigration Nation.

On July 22, 2013, Democratic Perspective took on the politically-charged subject of immigration policy and Senate Bill 744, the Immigration Reform Bill that recently passed the US Senate.

It seems almost everybody has an opinion about immigration. But many lack an understanding of its causes. And many conflate illegal drug trafficking with illegal border crossings by people simply looking for work and a chance to improve conditions for themselves and their families…the same motivations that led to previous waves of immigration into the United States.

The original immigrants, including our Founding Fathers, didn’t wait in lines. They didn’t apply for entry. They weren’t welcomed by the original population. But they came anyway. In fact, our nation was built by immigrants who came here for opportunity or were displaced for economic, religious or political reasons. They came from virtually every nation and region on Earth.

It was because of this that America became known as the Great Melting Pot.

The first political opposition to immigration didn’t come until 1843 when the Know Nothing Party (that’s not an opinion, it’s the real name) objected to the arrival of Irish and German Catholics. But the first immigration law was the Page Act of 1875, also known as the Asian Exclusion Act, designed to limit the influx of Asians settling on the west coast during the Gold Rush. In 1917, the Literacy Act further limited immigration, followed by the Immigration Act of 1924, and the Internal Security Act of 1950.

By far the most controversial immigration law came in 1954. Known as Operation Wetback, the new law led to the apprehension and deportation of more than one million Mexican immigrants within the first year. Many of those deported were not allowed to reclaim their possessions. They were often stranded without food or employment. And some were simply left in the desert.

Despite that sad episode, immigrants kept coming across the southern border until, today, it’s estimated that 11 million undocumented people are living here. Most came here through a school or work visa and simply overstayed the allotted time.

Like past immigrants, today’s immigrants come to the US for opportunity. Some have been displaced by political persecution. Some have been displaced for economic reasons. The US-backed wars in El Salvador and Nicaragua led to refugees coming to the US to escape the violence in their homelands. And NAFTA (North America Free Trade Agreement) led to large US agribusinesses dumping corn in Mexico and Central America, making it impossible for small farmers to succeed and driving them into cities looking for work. When they couldn’t find work, they moved to Mexican cities along the border hoping to catch on at one of the factories. Eventually, they came to the US.

In recent years, the US government has poured money – $106 billion since 2007 – into a fence and the Border Patrol in an attempt to block illegal immigration. Homeland Security reported 365,000 apprehensions by the Border Patrol in 2012. As a result, illegal immigration is now estimated at net zero, or likely even negative.

Yet S.744 calls for spending $34 billion more to secure the border.

The bill would double the current size of the Border Patrol along the southern border, making the force larger than the FBI. It would complete the “danged” fence. And it would add a variety of new technologies, including drones, to prevent illegal border crossings.

The result of weeks of floor debate and months of private negotiations by the Gang of Eight — a group of four Democrats and four Republicans including Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), Sen. Robert Menendez (D-N.J.) and Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), the bill eventually passed by a vote of 68-32 with fourteen Republicans crossing the aisle.

If passed by the House and signed into law by President Obama, the bill would establish a 13-year pathway to citizenship for millions of undocumented immigrants. Following are the basics of the bill:

1. S.744 requires that a series of enforcement measures go into effect prior to completing the legalization process.

2. Provides a path to Lawful Permanent Residence (“green card”) for the existing undocumented population by creating a new Registered Provisional Immigrant (RPI) program.

3. Before those with RPI status can apply for Lawful Permanent Resident status, certain security goals, or “triggers,” must be met, including increased border security and a fully-implemented E-Verify employment verification.

4. S.744 creates an independent Department of Homeland Security Border Oversight Task Force, with 29 members appointed by the President, including 12 members from the northern border region and 17 from the southern border region.

5. The bill addresses immigration removal, detention, and court processes, including authorizing access to counsel for certain vulnerable populations, giving immigration judges more opportunity to make case-by-case determinations on removal decisions, and streamlining the asylum program.

6. It increases penalties for certain criminal activities, making it more difficult or impossible to become a legal resident due to drunk-driving convictions, gang activity, domestic violence, passport fraud, and identity theft.

Following passage by the Senate, House Speaker John Boehner pronounced the bill dead on arrival in the House. He has ruled out taking up the Senate bill and suggests that the House may address some of the issues on a piecemeal basis. Many House Republicans have announced outright opposition to any immigration bill that offers a path to citizenship for those in our country illegally, while Democrats are opposed to any bill that falls short of citizenship for all 11 million who are in the country illegally. So the likelihood of immigration reform is tenuous at best.

You can read the entire Senate bill at the Immigration Policy Center website.  Be sure to explore the site because it contains many other articles and reports that you may find educational and useful.

Posted in Arizona Politics, Department of Homeland Security, Drug Trafficking, Government, Immigration, Law Enforcement, Legal Issues, National Politics, National Security | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Immigration Nation.

Immigration Reform and Senate Bill S744 — Podcast July 22, 2013


Immigration Therapy: U.S. Senate Bill S744 and the Prospects for Genuine Immigration Reform. Gary LaMaster joins Democratic Perspective co-hosts Mike Cosentino and Steve Williamson to discuss what we mean when we say immigration reform,  why it’s crucial to the future of the U.S. economy and U.S. civil society, and where S744 falls short of what we might have hoped.

Posted in Arizona Law Enforcement, Arizona Politics, Bigotry, Department of Homeland Security, Drug Trafficking, Immigration, National Politics, Podcasts | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Immigration Reform and Senate Bill S744 — Podcast July 22, 2013