Angela LeFevre and Doug Ballard Interview — Podcast October 8, 2012


Angela LeFevre and Doug Ballard: The Jobs Team. What would it be like if we elected people to our Arizona State Legislature who were deeply concerned about our health, welfare, and economic future, and had sensible plans to do something about making them better? Democratic Perspective co-hosts Mike Cosentino and Steve Williamson talk to Angela LeFevre and Doug Ballard, Democratic candidates for the Arizona State Legislature from LD 6, about their plans to fix our broken education system, promote business and jobs, and replace ideological extremism with a program of improvements that can actually help us.

Posted in Arizona Budget, Arizona Politics, Education, Interviews, Jobs and Employment, Podcasts | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Angela LeFevre and Doug Ballard Interview — Podcast October 8, 2012

The Truth About “Obamacare.”

Once again, Democratic Perspective visited with Dean Baker, co-founder and co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research. This time, the topic was the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA).

We began by asking about the benefits of the new law. Baker responded, “There’s not a lot of understanding of what’s in it. Part of it is that most of it doesn’t actually take effect until 2014. But there are a few things that have taken effect already. Insurers have to allow kids to stay on their parents’ policy until they’re 25. There are a couple of other things. But the brunt of the bill is that it is going to extend coverage to somewhere on the order of 30 million people.”

“It will set up exchanges at the state level,” he continued. “You’ll be able to go online, plug in information about your family and get a list of policies. There will be subsidies for low and moderate income people to make it affordable and there’s this mandate. You’re required to have insurance or you can opt out and pay a fine (tax).”

“In my mind, the most important thing is that it requires that insurers cover people regardless of pre-existing conditons,” said Baker. “This is absolutely huge. What Obamacare does that I think is so important is that, if you’re insured, you’re always going to pay at standard insured rates. They’re not allowed to discriminate against you if you have cancer or some other condition.”

As for the timing of the bill, Baker said, “I think it’s unfortunate from President Obama’s perspective that he’s running for re-election and people still don’t understand what it is. If it had taken effect in January of 2012, people would understand what it is. A lot of people may not like it, who knows? But at least they’d understand it.”

When asked why there is a mandate to buy insurance, Baker replied, “There’s a real logic to this. The problem is if you don’t have something like the mandate, when I’m in good health, why should I waste my money on insurance? Then, if it turns out next year that I get a serious illness, I’ll buy insurance. But if everyone does that, then the market collapses.”

Asked to comment on a similar law that Mitt Romney signed into effect in Massachussetts, Baker responded, “It covers 95 to 97%. If Governor Romney wanted to run on that, he’d have a good story to tell.”

The Supreme Court ruled that states will have the ability to opt out of the portion of the law that expands Medicaid. “I think it’s unfortunate that the Supreme Court ruling allows this,” Baker said. “But obviously most states are not going to opt out. The ones that do, in time, are probably going to change their minds because they’d be throwing a lot of money in the toilet. The same thing happened with the original stimulus in 2009. There were a number of Republican governors who said we’re not going to take this money. Almost all of them turned around subsequently and took it. There aren’t a lot states sitting around with big piles of money. So here’s the federal government prepared to give you money…and it’s pretty hard to say we don’t want it. Give it to another state.”

As to the Republican charge that Obamacare is going to hurt Medicare, Baker responded “What Obamacare does with Medicare is that it does try to keep the program intact. One of the things that Governor Romney really hasn’t explained is that he says that he’s not going to have the cut and savings. But if he doesn’t do that, the program is going to face a shortfall beginning in 2016. So if he becomes president, in his first term in office, he has to do something.”

“What President Obama’s program does is that it cuts back payments for drugs to hospitals,” Baker continued. “This was actually negotiated in the process. He brought in the drug industry from the very beginning. He brought in the hospitals from the very beginning. These were cuts that were negotiated with the providers and the idea was that Medicare would continue to provide the same service, but they would be paying somewhat less to providers and drug companies.”

“It extends Medicare to 2024,” Baker stated. “It’s kind of funny, Republicans say, ‘What’s your plan to keep Medicare solvent?’ But Obamacare extends the program by 8 years. More importantly, it has a 75 year horizon and it reduces the shortfall over that horizon by about two-thirds. So to say that he hasn’t done anything, well, he eliminates two-thirds of the shortfall. That’s a pretty good start.”

“Obviously, we have to do more. But one thing you have to keep in mind; we spend more than twice as much per person than the average for other wealthy nations. We have very little to show for that. We don’t live longer. Our life expectancies are near the bottom. Infant mortality rates are near the top. So we have an enormous amount of waste in the system. This is a step toward reducing it. No doubt, we have to go much further. I think anyone would have to agree with that. But it’s a little odd for the Republicans to be blaming President Obama for not having solved all the problems. He certainly has done more toward that than any president since Medicare first came into existence.”

When asked why Democrats haven’t publicized the benefits, Baker responded, “Well, there are all sorts of things that have been printed on it. At this point, we’re a year and a half out from the main provisions taking effect – about 15 months at this point. There are a lot of reasons to think that it’s going to be very good. Again, we have to move forward because we’re paying way too much for our healthcare. It does some things to contain costs which are way out of line with the rest of the world so we have a long way to go.”

“I give Obama a lot of credit for getting this through,” Baker stated.

As for other aspects of the bill, Baker said, “A lot of people got checks, and I was one of them, from the insurance companies because they are required to spend at least 80 percent of premiums to providing care. There was something like 5 million people around the country who got those checks.”

“Obamacare will have no caps on lifetime care,” he continued. “There are a lot of other provisions. Most of the things people agree with. “I think it’s a bill that will extend insruance coverage to most of the people who are not insured.”

For more information, visit http://www.healthcare.gov/law/timeline/.

Posted in Affordable Care Act, Economic Policy, Government, Health Care, Interviews, Medicaid, Medicare, National Politics | Tagged , , | Comments Off on The Truth About “Obamacare.”

Dean Baker Interview — Podcast October 1, 2012


The Affordable Care Act: What It’s Really All About. Progressive economist Dean Baker, co-founder and co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research, returns to Democratic Perspective to discuss the details of the Affordable Care Act, otherwise known as Obamacare: Who it will cover, how it will be financed and managed, and what parts of it still remain problematic. He explains the reasons for the mandate, how the insurance exchanges will work, and why the subsidies will make it affordable for Americans with lower incomes. An excellent overview, and and an even better antidote to the nonsense that the scaremongers of the right are saying about the most important expansion of medical coverage since the introduction of Medicare.

Posted in Affordable Care Act, Arizona Politics, Health Care, Interviews, Medicaid, Medicare, Podcasts | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Dean Baker Interview — Podcast October 1, 2012

The Betrayal of the American Dream.

Democratic Perspective was fortunate to interview James B. Steele on a recent show. Steele and Donald L. Barlett are America’s most honored investigative reporting team. The two have earned two Pulitzer Prizes and two National Magazine Awards.

Their collaboration began more than 40 years ago at The Philadelphia Inquirer. They then worked at Time magazine. And for the past six years, they have reported for Vanity Fair. Barlett and Steele have also authored seven books. The latest is a New York Times bestseller entitled The Betrayal of the American Dream.

We began our interview by asking Steele to define the American Dream. He described it as “a good life, possibly some security in retirement, a good house and the prospect of things being better for the next generation.”

He then detailed some of the government policies that have systematically destroyed the Dream.

For example, Steele talked about the cost of free trade which, in his words, is “really not free.” To support his claims, Steele referred to those he calls iSlaves (the Chinese workers who make all of Apple’s products) and the destruction of the Vise-Grip company which was originally located in central Nebraska.

Another of the policies described in the book is deregulation. “We’ve been in a mindset of deregulation for decades,” Steele said. “The result has been economic chaos.”

As a matter of fact, much of the work by Barlett and Steele has detailed the negative effects of government policy on the middle class. In addition to free trade and deregulation, the new book focuses on the cost of tax policy, the end of pension plans, and globalization.

All have been very bad news for middle class Americans, according to the authors. But Barlett and Steele do offer some hope and ideas to restore the American Dream.

In particular, they suggest asking potential candidates the following:
1. Will you support tax reform that restores fairness to personal and corporate tax rates?
2. Will you support US manufacturing and other sectors of the economy by working for a more balanced trade policy?
3. Will you support government investment in essential infrastructure that helps business and creates jobs?
4. Will you help keep the benefits of US innovation within the United States and work to prevent those benefits from being outsourced?

To learn more, we encourage you to listen to the entire show or visit their website.

Posted in De-regulation, Economic Policy, Government, Income Inequality, Industrial Policy, Interviews, National Politics, Offshoring, Tax and Investment Policy, Trade Policy | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on The Betrayal of the American Dream.

James B. Steele Interview — Podcast September 24, 2012


The Betrayal of the American Dream: An Interview with James B. Steele. Democratic Perspective c0-hosts Mike Cosentino and Gary LaMaster, interview Vanity Fair reporter and Pulitzer Prize-winning author and journalist James B. Steele about his new book, The Betrayal of the American Dream. Co-authored with his long-time collaborator and co-Pulitzer winner, Donald L. Bartlett, this new work takes a well-documented look at the devastating effect of 40 years of misguided regulation, trade, tax and fiscal policies on the American middle class.

Posted in De-regulation, Economic Policy, Economic Stimulus, Financial Crisis, Fiscal Policy, Industrial Policy, Interviews, Jobs and Employment, National Politics, Offshoring, Podcasts, Tax and Investment Policy, Trade Policy, Unemployment | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on James B. Steele Interview — Podcast September 24, 2012

Shedding Light On The Solyndra Failure.

Our editorial board member, Bill Timberman, has a unique ability to research a subject in depth and clearly explain his findings to others. So Democratic Perspective asked him to tell us what happened to Solyndra.

For the complete Solyndra story, I highly recommend that you listen to the program on podcast. However, following are some of the highlights:

Solyndra was founded in 2005 when the silicon needed for solar panels was $400 per pound, a fact that made solar uncompetitive with fossil fuels with regard to price. However, Solyndra developed solar panels that were made of a less expensive, more efficient material. The company also developed a more efficient shape for its panels. As a result, Solyndra panels were 7 percent more efficient and benefited from less expensive installation costs.

By 2007, Solyndra had working prototypes and applied for a federally-backed loan. By the end of the Bush administration, the loan was in the works but had not yet been approved. The company needed a new manufacturing plant in order to compete. But since it didn’t receive the federal loan until 2009-2010, it began having cash flow problems.

Solyndra seemed like a promising company right up until the loan was approved. But almost simultaneously, the Great Recession led to a dramatic drop in the price of silicon which led to the loss in Solyndra’s competitive price advantage. Around the same time, China ramped up production and flooded the world markets with less expensive solar panels.

All of this led to the bankruptcy of Solyndra and its default on the federal loan. Of course, Republicans led by Darrell Issa wanted to turn the failure into a story of crony capitalism committed by the Obama administration.

That proved to be entirely false. Indeed, there were many Republican investors in Solyndra, including the Walton family which controls the WalMart fortunes.
Moreover, not all of the federal money used to back the loan to Solyndra was lost. Of the $530 million loan, the government will get more than $135 million back. The loan to Solyndra represented just 1.3 percent of all of the Obama administration’s loan guarantees for alternative energy. And it was the only failure.

Indeed, Bill concluded that the technology developed by Solyndra will eventually become more viable as the economy recovers and the price of silicon increases.

The show has much more to offer, so please listen to it in its entirety.

Posted in Economic Stimulus, Environment, Government, Industrial Policy, Jobs and Employment, National Politics, Tax and Investment Policy | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Shedding Light On The Solyndra Failure.

The Real Solyndra Story — Podcast September 17, 2012


The Real Solyndra Story: Why Republican Opposition to Government Loan Guarantees Is a Threat to America’s Future. Bill Timberman, from the Editorial Board of Democratic Perspective, joins co-hosts Mike Cosentino and Steve Williamson to discuss the Solyndra bankruptcy, the economics of renewable energy development, and the role of Federal loan guarantees in supporting the development of new energy technologies. Why the Republican Party, in its steadfast opposition to a U.S. industrial policy, is sabotaging our country’s future.

Posted in Economic Policy, Economic Stimulus, Financial Crisis, Fiscal Policy, Government, Industrial Policy, Jobs and Employment, National Politics, Podcasts | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The Real Solyndra Story — Podcast September 17, 2012

The History Of Our Economy And How To Fix It.

Democratic Perspective was again fortunate to host Thomas Palley, economist, author and Schwartz Economic Growth Fellow at the New America Foundation.

Asked to comment on the issues confronting the US economy, Palley responded, “The argument that I’m making in my book is that around 1980, we put in place a new economic model – call it trickle down, call it Reaganomics, call it supply side, call it corporate globalization. What that did was that it hollowed out the economy. That’s when we start to see the emergence of wage stagnation. That’s when we start to see the explosion in income inequality. That’s when we start to hear about outsourcing and the downsizing and disappearance of manufacturing. That eroded the American middle class. And it created a problem – we’re short demand.”

“But the demand shortage was then covered up by this process of finance,” he continued. “So we had bubble after bubble after bubble. Using finance in this way was a sort of Ponzi scheme. And that’s the problem why we’re not having a recovery despite all of the stimulus and low interest rates. Until we get our hands on this basic problem and bring back the middle class, we’re going to have ongoing stagnation.”

We then asked why he is opposed to tax cuts for the wealthy as a means of job creation. “I’m fundamentally opposed to them on two levels,” he responded. “We’ve really pushed tax rates to the lowest they’ve been in the era since the Second World War. And we’ve had, during this whole time, a continuing worsening of economic performance. We saw a widening of income inequality, which again is part of this structural problem. And then the worst piece about it is that it has produced year after year of deficits.”

“The idea that lowering taxes solves deficits is absolutely amazing,” Palley continued. “It just can’t possibly work and we see it in the numbers. Of course Romney and Ryan say that they are for balanced budgets, and then immediately propose to cut taxes at an enormous, fantastic rate, it fails the arithmatic test.”

“If you really want to understand these guys,” he offered. “When they say they’re for balanced budgets, they exploit peoples’ good will. But the reality is they’re never for balanced budgets. When you cut taxes, you create a deficit. You then use the deficit as an excuse to cut every single program that government does. You go after Medicaid. You go after Social Security. You go after education. You go after health. You go after all the things that government does to make us a rich and happy society to contribute to our well-being. They never really want balanced budgets. All they want to do is cut taxes and actually destroy government.”

When asked why we can’t strengthen Social Security, instead of cutting it, Palley said, “Well that was the history of the program until the early 1980s – 1983, the Greenspan Commission when Reaganomics took hold of people’s imaginations and we started to use economics to hurt ourselves. But if you go back and look at how much of the national pie was taxed to provide for Social Security, back in the late 1970s it peaked. But since the 1970s we’ve been running down the taxes that we pay into Social Security as a share of the pie.”

We then asked for his thoughts on the job creators. “Well, I think we’ve heard enough of that,” said Palley. “Yes, no jobs were created without business, but on the other hand you have to have the right type of business. There is a lot of business in this country that is about job destroying and making profits off the job destruction. So I’m completely with people who say we can only do this working with business and we have to put in the right rules for business so that business interest is aligned with the country’s interests and is aligned with the middle class.”

As for the auto bailout, Palley said, “It is an amazing, amazing accomplishment. What he (President Obama) did is that he kept together one of the major manufacturing centers in the US. All of those manufacturing jobs that go into making the parts the assemblers use. Without that bailout, it’s scary to think what places like Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, and Detroit, Michigan would all look like. It’s not just about GM, Chrysler and Ford. All of the other car companies here use those same parts suppliers. It would have been a domino effect with one company pushing down another.”

“It’s one of the amazing successes of that time,” he continued. “I think there was a tremendous amount of misunderstanding about what happened. And I think the Republicans purposely fueled that misunderstanding because its success was political poison for them. I think they were out to sabotage this president and they don’t give a damn about the American people. As long as they eventually got back into power so they could begin again this regimen of tax cuts for the richest.”

Asked for his thoughts on strengthening our economy, Palley offered three keys. “First, we’ve got to get wages connected to productivity,” he said. “That was the secret of the period from 1945 to 1975 when we had shared prosperity. That means we’re going to have to raise the minimum wage to bring up the floor of the economy and we’re going to have to make it possible for workers to share in their productivity growth by building unions again. Number two, we have to deal with our trade deficit and our problem of our overvalued dollar. And then we’re going to have to do something with our public investment. We need to put some juice in the economy while we wait for these other measures to take effect. Now’s the time, when interest rates are low, to invest in the infrastructure we need.”

To learn more, visit http://www.thomaspalley.com/.

Posted in Economic Policy, Economic Stimulus, Financial Crisis, Fiscal Policy, Government, Interviews, Jobs and Employment, Monetary Policy, National Politics, Offshoring, Social Security, Tax and Investment Policy, Taxes and the Deficit, U.S. Budget | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on The History Of Our Economy And How To Fix It.

Thomas Palley Interview — September 10, 2012


The Economic Crisis and What We Can Do About It: Economist Thomas Palley, whose most recent book, The Economic Crisis: Notes From the Underground, was published this May, returns to Democratic Perspective to discuss the structure of the U.S. bubble economy, and the reasons for its collapse. He reviews the history of the current financial crisis, explains why a strong middle class is essential to genuine prosperity, and details what the Federal Government must do to help restore a more equitable distribution of income.

Posted in Foreclosures, Government, Income Inequality, Interviews, Jobs and Employment, Medicaid, Medicare, Offshoring, Podcasts, Social Security, Tax and Investment Policy, Taxes and the Deficit, U.S. Budget, Unemployment | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Thomas Palley Interview — September 10, 2012

When the Truth Has No Defenders — Podcast September 3, 2012


Doing Your Job and Paying the Price: Why the Obama Administration Won’t Defend Its Own. Democratic Perspective co-hosts Mike Cosentino and Steve Williamson discuss the case of Daryl Johnson, former Senior Domestic Terrorist Analyst at the Dept. of Homeland Security, Office of Intelligence and Analysis, whose department was disbanded after Republicans complained about a well-documented report he authored on the potential threat of right-wing domestic terrorism.

He’s not the first Obama Administration official to be disciplined or even fired outright for telling the truth, and he may not be the last. Mike and Steve examine why Democrats seemingly won’t defend their own against the media frenzies generated by Republican lies and disinformation.

Posted in Government, Law Enforcement, Media Campaigns, Medicare, Military, National Politics, Podcasts | Tagged , , | Comments Off on When the Truth Has No Defenders — Podcast September 3, 2012