Of Terrorists, Bullies and Lies.

On Labor Day we were expecting to interview Daryl Johnson, former senior domestic terrorist analyist at the Dept. of Homeland Security, Office of Intelligence and Analysis, but he had to reschedule at the last minute. Without a guest, Steve and Mike forged ahead by explaining the unexpected controversy that stemmed from a relatively routine report written by Mr. Johnson and released in early 2009.

The report, called “Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Radicalization and Recruitment,” was intended for law enforcement. But it was immediately leaked by the far right in order to attack the new administration.

Since many of the potential terrorist groups and militias consist of former members of the military, the right characterized the report as an attack on the military and the 2nd Amendment. They even threatened a Congressional investigation. The obvious intent was to hurt the new administration before it had a chance to get its feet on the ground.

With its plate full of more important issues inherited from the Bush administration such as the economic crisis it, the Iraq War, the Afghan War and more, the new administration chose not to fight back. So Democrats stopped all investigations and reporting of potential domestic terrorist groups.

Moreover, the DHS apologized for the report and disbanded Johnson’s department.

Too often this is the Democratic reaction to right wing attacks, said Mike and Steve. For example, Democrats also failed to fight back against to the fabricated and unjustified attack on Shirley Sherrod. More recently, the administration has seemed slow to respond to Republicans’ false claims that President Obama cut $740 billion from Medicare.

Steve and Mike asked why Democrats don’t fight back. After some discussion, they answered their own question by concluding that attacks are simple and often memorable, while honest explanations are complicated and often boring.

They also discussed the media’s reluctance to use the word “lie” with regard to the Republican National Convention. Ryan’s and Romney’s speeches were filled with false and misleading statements, yet the media has refused to describe them as such. Mike had compiled a list of euphemisms used in reporting the convention, such as “factual shortcuts,” “factually shaky,” “double-speak,” “demonstrably misleading,” “prevarications,” etc.

Perhaps if the media actually called a lie a lie, Republicans might tell fewer of them.

Posted in Government, Law Enforcement, Medicare, Military, National Politics | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Of Terrorists, Bullies and Lies.

Dean Baker Interview — Podcast August 27, 2012


The Republican Flim-Flam: Bain Capital, the Ryan Budget, and Federal Deficit Hysteria. Progressive economist Dean Baker, co-founder and co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research, returns to Democratic Perspective to debunk some of the popular Republican myths about our economy:

First, he explains what private equity funds like Bain Capital really do. (Very often their investments are less about rescuing failing companies than about cannibalizing them for the benefit of the fund owners — not so different from what the Mafia does when it invests in a New Jersey liquor store.)

Next, he explains what the Congressional Budget Office’s analysis and scoring of the Ryan budget proposal actually says –perhaps not surprisingly,  the CBO concludes that the Ryan budget would actually increase the deficit, reduce taxes on the 1% while increasing them for the middle class, and do away with all government expenditures except those for the military.

Finally, Dr. Baker proposes a responsible way to address the federal budget deficit, and explains what the Republicans really mean when they talk about reforming Social Security.

Posted in Deficit Reduction, Economic Policy, Income Inequality, Interviews, National Politics, Podcasts, U.S. Budget, Unemployment | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Dean Baker Interview — Podcast August 27, 2012

A Pollster’s View Of The Upcoming Elections.

Once again, Democratic Perspective was privileged to host Democratic pollster and strategist, Celinda Lake. Her clients include the Democratic National Committee (DNC), the Democratic Governor’s Association (DGA), The White House Project, AFL-CIO, Human Rights Campaign, EMILY’s List and the Kaiser Family Foundation.
Along with Republican pollster, Kellyanne Conway, she co-authored What Women Really Want, a book that examines the way women are changing the political landscape in America.

We began by asking for her insights on the presidential race. “The numbers are very unique for this point in the race,” she said. “Romney is having much more trouble with the base at this point than a Republican usually has. A quarter of his voters said they would consider someone else. Only a third of his voters said they are voting for him. And Republican enthusiasm is actually declining. The Romney pick (of vice-presidential candidate Congressman Paul Ryan) produced the least bounce we’ve had in the last nine presidential elections.”

“It’s energized the Democrats as much as it’s energized the Republicans, she continued. “But you have a very tough economy and it would be very foolish to take for granted Obama’s re-election in such a tough economy.”

“There are very few undecided voters,” Lake added. “You have 15 percent of Obama voters who say they’d consider someone else and you have 25 percent of Romney voters who say they’d consider someone else. So that’s what’s undecided. There are a quarter of the voters who are still up for grabs. I think it does help explain why this campaign is as negative as it is. They are concentrating on anywhere from 12 to 15 battleground states.”

Asked to predict the race; whether it’s going to be very close, or if it will break one way or the other at the last minute, she responded, “I think either one could happen. But right now, I think you have to be set on it being pretty close. In the last few years, Republicans have taken a page out of the Democratic playbook and are very focused on GOTV (Get Out The Vote). They know how to do it.”

Addressing the war on women and Ryan’s stance on abortion, Lake said, “He has a very strict interpretation and he would have a Constitutional amendment on personhood. It would mean you would be in a situation where invitro fertilization would be outlawed, many forms of birth control would be outlawed, you would have miscarriages being investigated by the police…it’s ridiculous.”

As for the overwhelming amount of money being spent in this campaign, she said, “There’s talk now that the race is going to cost between $3-4 billion. We have to get an amendment passed. This is not free speech. This is paid speech, and that’s different. The Koch brothers alone will spend more on this campaign than John McCain spent on his entire presidential campaign. That’s wrong. That’s just plain wrong!”

Turning to the Senate race in Arizona, Lake said, “It’s a very exciting race. And I’d be interested in your listeners’ opinions about it. Nationally, people think this race is great; that Carmona is a fantastic recruit; that he is not a typical politician; that he has a record of public service and people are very excited. The primary is getting stranger and stranger with Flake coming out to do away with the 17th amendment…in Arizona of all places. To tell voters that they’re not going to get their say on something as important as a US senator? That’s not going to fly.”

Asked what’s behind such ideas, Lake replied, “First, it’s the emergence of the Tea Party which you have seen emerge in Arizona. The Tea Party has really been taken over by the right now – the kook faction – and they are so extreme.”

“Another thing that is fostering this conservatism is that so many moderate Republicans are scared to death of losing their primary,” she said. “It’s why Olympia Snow is not running.”

“The other thing behind this is this right wing money,” she added, “the Koch brothers, for example.”

We ended the interview by asking what one message she’d like to give to listeners. She replied, “The most important thing at this point, when we’re less than 80 days out from the election is to make sure we get the Democratic base out to vote. Tell your family and friends to vote. Don’t vote alone.”

Posted in Arizona Politics, Campaign Finance, Interviews, National Politics, Polling, Women's Rights | Tagged | Comments Off on A Pollster’s View Of The Upcoming Elections.

Celinda Lake Interview — Podcast August 20, 2012


The 2012 Elections: Where Are We Now? Last on our show on in late May, Celinda Lake, one of the Democratic Party’s leading pollsters and consultants, returns to Democratic Perspective to review the issues, the candidates and the Democratic Party’s prospects for the 2012 elections. With co-hosts Mike Cosentino and Steve Williamson, she discusses what has changed, what races are in play, and what the polling results show so far.

Posted in Affordable Care Act, Arizona Politics, Dark Money, Elections, Interviews, Jobs and Employment, National Politics, Podcasts, Political Action Committees, Political Contributions, Polling, Taxes and the Deficit, Women's Rights | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Celinda Lake Interview — Podcast August 20, 2012

The End Of Arpaiocracy?

This week, Democratic Perspective hosted Paul Penzone who is running against Joe Arpaio, self-proclaimed as “America’s Toughest Sheriff.”

Penzone studied criminal justice, graduating from Northern Arizona University before joining the Phoenix Police Department in 1998. During his 21-year career, he began as a patrol officer and rose through the ranks to manage the successful Silent Witness program. He has been recognized for capturing high value criminals.

We began by asking why he’s running for sheriff. He answered, “What I’ve seen is a change in leadership over the years where there’s a loss of focus on serving our community and, because I believe so much on what law enforcement represents, I just couldn’t stay on the sidelines when I knew I could make a difference to bring it back to where our community feels galvanized and safer as opposed to fragmented as we are right now.”

Turning to Arpaio’s record, we asked about reports that 75 percent of the cases in Maricopa County are cleared without arrests. “What’s happening there is just a lack of fundamentally sound law enforcement,” Penzone said. “It’s not easy to solve cases, but at the same time, if you’re seeing cases cleared without any arrests whatsoever, what that’s telling you is that there’s not a thorough enough investigation, the deputies are not trained effectively enough to be accomplishing the things that we need. If three-fourths of the cases that you’re engaged in have no arrests, yet there are criminal implications, you’re really failing in your effort to keep the community safe.”

Asked about the 40,000 felony warrants in Maricopa County that have not served, he replied, “We went back and forth on those numbers. It was 40,000 at one time, but now I think the number is around 30,000…because other agencies have gotten engaged.”
“It’s really important that everyone understands that the majority of crimes are committed by a small percentage of the population,” he continued. “And unfortunately, those are the felony cases that we’re speaking about. If you want to reduce crime, you must hold those accountable who are already responsible for crime. If not, they’re back out on the street repeating their behaviors. The sheriff is the only leader, or at least one of the few in our county, that has not committed full-time deputies to a task force focused solely on the recovery of wanted fugitives. That tells me that he’s not focused on the biggest threat to our safety.”

We then asked about MCSO’s failure to investigate sex crimes and child molestations in El Mirage. “I’m very familiar with a lot of these cases,” he said. “As a matter of fact, when the sheriff’s office was removed from that contract, El Mirage started its own Police Department. It was two former assistant chiefs of the Phoenix PD who went out there to – the only thing I can say is to clean up the mess – because, unfortunately, that community was neglected. If we saw that in other communities, I don’t think it would have gone quietly into the night.”

Addressing the estimated $6 million spent on lawsuits defending Arpaio, Penzone said, “Well, actually the number is far higher. The number in the lawsuits is upwards of $50 million of costs and payouts. To put it in perspective, that is about the equivalent of the budget for an entire moderate-sized police department such as the Scottsdale Police Department. That is their annual budget.”

“It’s bad enough when we see a person we elected to public office abuse their authority,” he continued. “But when you add to that law enforcement powers it is a very intimidating, destructive force that can do a lot to tear apart our community. We have a great opportunity here. We, literally overnight in one election, can change the course of the reputation of our community across the nation and send a message that our community will no longer tolerate this. We don’t need the Department of Justice to step in on our behalf. We can get the ship righted.”

Questioned about his own priorities, Penzone responded, “Fugitives must be a priority. We have a severe challege as it relates to drug trafficking, human trafficking and human slavery. There are young people within our community, not just those who are immigrants from Mexico or other countries, but US citizens who are being victimized and treated as slaves and prostitutes on our streets. We have a challenge with crime against children as well as families, in general. We have to protect the core value within our communities, which is our families.”

“For me the priorities would be ensuring that detention centers are being run properly, safely and efficiently, that the areas under the jurisdiction of the sheriff…patrols and the investigative resources dedicated there must be properly allocated for the safety of deputies as much as for the communities,” he continued. “Fugitives and crimes against children will always be a priority for me because they’re our future, our most precious asset, and we must protect them.”

Asked if immigration should be a priority, he stated, “We only have so many resources and so many dollars that can be allocated as relates to illegal immigration. We have to make a decision if we want those dollars spent on criminals in our community…I understand that being in the country illegally is a crime…but I’m speaking of those responsible for robberies and burgalries and sex crimes and other issues. If we spend our resources on immigration and neglect other areas, we are not safer because of it.”

As for Arpaio’s national fame, Penzone said, “I’m a firm believer that the best law enforcement is the one that draws the least amount of attention. The only time we should be seen in the community is when we need help solving a crime or when we need to provide information so you can be safer in your life.”

Posted in Arizona Law Enforcement, Arizona Politics, Interviews, Law Enforcement | Tagged , , | Comments Off on The End Of Arpaiocracy?

Paul Penzone Interview — Podcast August 13, 2012


Competence, Community Accountability and Fiscal Responsibility: Why Paul Penzone Is a Better Choice for Maricopa County Sheriff. Democratic Perspective interviews Paul Penzone, Democratic candidate for Maricopa County Sheriff. What would it be like to have a sheriff’s department that is professional, dedicated to proven principles of effective law enforcement, and free from ideological grandstanding? Paul Penzone, 21-year veteran of the Phoenix Police Department, explains how he would re-focus the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Department on its real priorities: to safeguard and serve the Maricopa County community and to provide it with the competent law enforcement it deserves.

Posted in Arizona Law Enforcement, Arizona Politics, Interviews, Law Enforcement, Podcasts | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Paul Penzone Interview — Podcast August 13, 2012

Voter Suppression Update — Podcast August 6. 2012


A Blatant Attempt To Steal the Election: Update on Republican Voter Suppression Tactics. Democratic Perspective revisits the Republican Party’s attempts to disenfranchise traditionally Democratic voters, evade the provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, and guarantee themselves election victories that they don’t deserve.

Posted in Elections, National Politics, Podcasts | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Voter Suppression Update — Podcast August 6. 2012

A Blatant Attempt To Steal The Election

Once again, Democratic Perspective looked at Republican attempts to suppress the vote. As we’ve noted before, numerous studies, including a 2007 study by the Bush administration, have found very few instances of voter fraud.

Nevertheless, Republicans have used antecdotal evidence of a few instances to create fear with the system. They would like people to believe that, somehow, undocumented immigrants are going to vote for President Obama. This may be the most preposterous accusation ever, since it’s highly unlikely that undocumented immigrants would ever take the risk of exposing their situation to authorities.

But, for the time being, logic has been completely suspended with new voter ID laws already in place in nine states, many of them swing states that could determine the outcome of the election. These also happen to be states with the highest Latino population growth and the highest black voter turnout – groups that are most likely to vote for Obama.

Make no mistake; these laws are not about fixing a problem. They are all about politics. A Republican leader has as much as admitted so.

In a speech to other Republicans, Pennsylvania House Majority Leader, Rep. Mike Turzai, said the state’s voter ID law “is going to allow Governor Romney to win the state of Pennsylvania.”

The push to require voter ID began immediately after the 2010 midterm elections when Republicans gained control of state legislatures and governorships and the effort has gained steam since then.

Of course, Republicans say that IDs are required for other activities, such as driving, flying, even at many workplaces. But those requirements don’t interfere with Constitutional rights.

The Brennan Center for Justice at New York University estimates that one in ten Americans lack the types of IDs being required. 10 million American voters live more than ten miles away from any office that issues IDs, and 500,000 of those voters don’t have access to a vehicle.

Moreover, the cost of the documents required for ID cost money. According to the Brennan Center, the cost of the documents is actually more in current dollars than the poll tax ruled unconsitutional in the 1960s.

Restrictive voter ID laws are only one of the methods the Republican Party is using to suppress the vote. Florida is, once again, attempting to expand its list of felons ineligible to vote. In 2000, a similar effort led to thousands of innocent people being denied the vote in an election decided by just 533 votes.

Florida is also one of the Republican-controlled states that have made it more difficult to register new voters. And several states are trying to restrict early voting.

All of this is not to say that we don’t need to fix a number of voting problems. The few known organized voter fraud efforts in the past involved absentee ballots, and they benefited Republicans. Of course, voter ID laws will do nothing to prevent that. There are also some registration problems. It’s difficult for counties and states to keep up with changes of address and deaths. But that hasn’t resulted in fraudulent votes.

Posted in Elections, National Politics | Tagged , , | Comments Off on A Blatant Attempt To Steal The Election

Republicans In Their Own Words.

This week, rather than talk about Republican politicians, Democratic Perspective chose to let them speak for themselves.

Mitt Romney —
“We have a president, who I think is a nice guy, but he spent too much time at Harvard, perhaps.” (Neglecting to mention that Romney has two Harvard degrees.)

As Massachussetts Governor, Romney said, “The individual mandate is essential for bringing the health care costs down for everyone and getting everyone the health insurance they need.” (Of course, as presidential candidate he is now opposed to the individual mandate.)

“Corporations are people, my friend…

“I’m not concerned about the very poor. We have a safety net there.”

“He [Obama] says we need more firemen, more policemen, more teachers. Did he not get the message of Wisconsin? The American people did. It’s time for us to cut back on government and help the American people.”

“Let Detroit Go Bankrupt,” Romney wrote in a 2009 New York Times op-ed. Then in 2012 he said, “I’ll take a lot of credit for the fact that this industry’s come back.”

“It’s hard to know just how well they [the 2012 London Olympics] will turn out. There are a few things that were disconcerting.” (Statement made while visiting London led one European newspaper to call Romney “The American Borat.”)

“I get speaker’s fees from time to time, but not very much.” (Romney earned $374,000 in speaking fees in one year according to according to his personal financial disclosure)

“I love this state. The trees are the right height.”

“PETA is not happy that my dog likes fresh air.” (Statement in response to questions about strapping his dog to the roof of his car.)

“I’m not familiar precisely with what I said, but I’ll stand by what I said, whatever it was.”

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell —
“The single most important thing we want to achieve is for President Obama to be a one-term president.”

Rep. Eric Cantor —
“Look, we know we screwed up when we were in the majority. We fell in love with power. We spent way too much money – especially on earmarks. There was too much corruption when we ran this place. We were guilty. And that’s why we lost.” (On Republicans losing control of Congress in 2006.)

Senator Jon Kyl —
“I object.” (Kyl said this more than 70 times to block President Obama’s appointments, including appointments of federal judges. Not long after, as he eulogized Judge John Roll, he lamented that Judge Roll was overworked because of the shortage of federal judges.)

Former Vice-President Dick Cheney —
“Deficits don’t matter.” (When asked about the massive deficits being run up as the result of two wars and the Bush tax cuts.)

Former State Senator Russell Pearce —
“Had someone been prepared and armed they could have stopped this “bad” man from most of this tragedy. He was two and three feet away from folks, I understand he had to stop and reload.” (Commenting on the mass killings in Aurora, Colorado.)

LD-6 State Senate Candidate Chester Crandell —
“It’s time ‘we the people’ stepped up … we will take over the management of the land, of the water, of the air” from the federal government. (On claiming state sovereignty over federal lands in Arizona.)

“We have a tremendous amount of public resources that are just wasted, totally wasted. If we used those resources, then we wouldn’t have to raise taxes,” said Crandell. “If you don’t use it — you’re going to lose it.”

LD-6 State House Candidate Brenda Barton —
“This is not a democracy. It is a constitutional republic. If it were a democracy, all the wolves would decide which lambs they want to have for dinner. Right now in the Valley they’re calling us ‘kooks,’ they’re working very, very hard to ‘dekookify’ the Legislature. They want to get rid of anyone who wants to live under the constitution.”

LD-6 State House Candidate Bob Thorpe —
“It’s time for another shot heard ’round the world,” “Let’s make Arizona an example of how we reclaim our liberties, which we have slowly allowed to erode. Liberty-loving patriots will lose a battle or two, but what we’re concerned about is whether we win the war or not — and we’re at war with the federal government.”

“It’s time the states reminded the federal government it was the states that created the federal government — federalism is a relationship between the states and the central government. The Founders were afraid of democracy and a powerful federal government — and that’s exactly what we have today.”

Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio —
“Sometimes these kinds of things occur in big departments like the Maricopa sheriff’s office. If there were any victims, I apologize.” (On his department’s failure to investigate hundreds of sex crimes.)

“I’m the only guy who’s not paranoid and everybody’s going after me.”

Posted in Arizona Politics, National Politics, Political Gaffes | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Republicans In Their Own Words.

Republican Candidates in Their Own Words — Podcast, July 30, 2012


Unintended Honesty: Republican Gaffes, and What They Reveal. Democratic Perspective’s  co-hosts Mike Cosentino and Gary LaMaster offer a choice selection of misstatements from Republican notables, beginning with Gov. and Mrs. Romney, and demonstrate that when Republicans put their feet in their mouths, they often tell us more about what they really believe than we could find out any other way.

Posted in Arizona Politics, National Politics, Podcasts, Political Gaffes | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Republican Candidates in Their Own Words — Podcast, July 30, 2012