Egyptian Politics: Past, Present And Future.

Democratic Perspective recently inteviewed Juan Cole, Richard P. Mitchell Collegiate Professor of History at the University of Michigan and author of Engaging the Muslim World and Sacred Space and Holy War.

We began by asking Cole about the political situation in Egypt. He answered, “Egypt has been in a slow motion collapse for sixty years (since the height of the Cold War). The Mubarak regime was east bloc light in which 60 percent of its people worked for the government. Conservatives would call it a nanny state because it took care of its people.”
“The Egyptian people wanted to move toward a parliamentary government,” Cole continued. “They had a police state and wanted free and fair elections. But they didn’t realize that the religious right would win elections. There’s a profound contrast between the nation’s procedural desire and reality.”

Asked about Egypt’s new leadership, Cole said, “Morsi won the presidential election for the Muslim Brotherhood and parliamentary elections will be held later this year. Morsi has somewhat subordinated the military. We haven’t seen intervention by the military since February.”

In response to a question about the potential for opposition to Morsi’s government, Cole said, “There could be. There are opposing parties and Morsi barely won the election. One of the opponents was out and out liberal. Another was a liberal Muslim. Morsi barely got into a runoff with a Mubarak clone. That’s not what the young people wanted, but the Muslim Brotherhood is more organized. The Brotherhood had contested Mubarak for 30 years so it has experience with canvassing and getting out the vote. As a result, it seems likely that the religious right will control the parliament.”

“Labor and the liberals who started Arab Spring are just going to have to get their act together and win elections,” he continued. “There is no evidence that Morsi stole the elections. They protested the military. Now they’re protesting their elected government. I don’t see their tactics as viable to run a government.”

Asked about the US role in Egypt, Cole responded, “I don’t think the US is very relevant in Egypt now. It couldn’t stand against a million people in Tahrir Square. But I don’t believe the administration can be very happy with the situation.”

As for Egypt’s relationship with Israel, Cole said, “It’s going to be chillier. Morsi has a strong relationship with Hamas…but I don’t expect a hostile relationship. Egyptians want Israel to accept a Palenstinian state. Israel has Gaza under a blockade preventing both imports and exports. It’s quite draconian.”

Looking into the future of Egypt, Cole stated, “The game is open. The parliamentary elections could be messy. Welcome to democracy.”

Posted in Elections, Foreign Affairs, Government, Interviews, Middle East, Military | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Egyptian Politics: Past, Present And Future.

Juan Cole Interview — Podcast January 28, 2013


Egypt Today: Juan Cole, Richard P. Mitchell Collegiate Professor of History at the University of Michigan, expert on Middle Eastern affairs, and author of the widely read and influential blog Informed Comment, talks with Democratic Perspective co-hosts Mike Cosentino and Steve Williamson about the continuing political conflict in Egypt in the wake of the Arab Spring. Professor Cole explains who is involved, what they want, and what their struggle portends for Egypt, for the Middle East as a whole, and for U.S. foreign policy in the region.

Posted in Foreign Affairs, Interviews, Middle East, Podcasts | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Juan Cole Interview — Podcast January 28, 2013

Fred DuVal Interview — Podcast January 21, 2013


What Arizona’s Future Demands: Democratic Perspective co-hosts Steve Williamson and Gary LaMaster interview prominent Arizona Democrat, and potential candidate for Governor in 2014, Fred DuVal, about what we need to secure Arizona’s place as a 21st Century leader in economic development and prosperity. Former White House Deputy Director of Intergovernmental Affairs under President Clinton, twice a member of the Democratic National Committee, a founder of the Democratic Leadership Council, and since 2006 a member of the Arizona Board of Regents, Mr. DuVal is among the best-qualified to assess Arizona’s future needs and challenges, and what must be done to address them.

Posted in Arizona Budget, Arizona Politics, Corrections Policy, Economic Policy, Education, Education Policy, Energy Policy, Government, Immigration, Interviews, Medicaid, Podcasts, Tax and Investment Policy | Tagged | Comments Off on Fred DuVal Interview — Podcast January 21, 2013

Michael L. “Mikey” Weinstein Interview — Podcast January 14, 2013


Christian Fundamentalism in U.S. Military Academies: Is It a Threat To Our National Security? Democratic Perspective co-hosts Mike Cosentino and Gary LaMaster talk to Michael “Mikey” Weinstein, founder of the Military Religious Freedom Foundation about the growing influence of Christian fundamentalists at U.S. military academies — when and how it began, how it violates the founding American principle of a separation between church and state, and why it threatens both our freedom and our national security.

Posted in Foreign Affairs, Government, Interviews, Military, Military Policy, National Politics, Podcasts, U.S. Armed Forces, Veterans' Issues | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Michael L. “Mikey” Weinstein Interview — Podcast January 14, 2013

What The NRA Doesn’t Want You To Know.

There were 34 mass shootings in the US in 2012 and more than 70 since Representative Gabby Giffords was shot in the head and 6 people killed at a Congress on Your Corner event in Tucson. On average, there are 32 gun murders in the US each and every day…a total of approximately 270,000 in the last decade.

That’s 6.9 times more than in 22 other wealthy nations combined!

Of course, the National Rifle Association would have us believe that the only way to reduce these numbers is to increase the number and availability of guns. In the words of NRA apologist, Wayne LaPierre, “the only answer to a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun.”

In reality, there is no evidence that more guns results in less violence.

The US has more guns and a higher incidence of gun ownership than any other nation in the world. In 2007, there were 88.8 guns per hundred people in the US. The next closest country was Serbia with 58.2 guns per hundred people. Given record gun sales since President Obama was elected in 2008, our gun dominance is likely much greater. So, if Mr. LaPierre is correct, our gun violence should be dramatically lower.

It’s not.

To counter the NRA’s claim, we need only look to two countries: Switzerland and Australia.
In Switzerland, virtually every able-bodied man is required to serve in the citizen militia. As a result, most homes have guns. Yet as Swiss gun ownership has increased, so has the nation’s murder rate. The nation now ranks 4th in the world for murders by guns. Suicide rates are also on the rise.

By contrast, following the Port Arthur massacre in 1996, Australia instituted strict gun control laws. It grouped firearms into 6 categories.

Category A consists of non semi-automatic rimfire rifles, air rifles and paintball guns which require Australian citizens to provide a “genuine reason” for ownership.

Category B consists of non-automatic centerfire rifles and muzzle loaders made after January 1, 1901. For these, citizens must demonstrate a “genuine need” for ownership.

Category C consists of semi-automatic rimfire rifles holding 10 or fewer rounds and pump-action or semi-automatic shotguns holding 5 or fewer rounds. These are strongly restricted.

Category D consists of semi-automatic centerfire rifles and semi-automatic or pump-action shotguns holding more than 5 rounds. These weapons are restricted to government agencies and a few “occupational” shooters.

Category H consists of handguns, including air pistols and deactivated handguns. These guns are available only to competitive target shooters who mush serve a 6-month probationary period and must demonstrate that they compete in a minimum number of matches each year or relinquish their gun.

Category R/E consists of restricted weapons such as assault rifles, machine guns, rocket launchers, flame-throwers, anti-tank guns, etc. These weapons may be owned by collectors providing they have been rendered permanently inoperable.

Draconian? Hardly. Effective? Yes.

These gun restrictions allow Australian citizens access to appropriate guns for hunting, target shooting and home defense. But the new laws prevent access to those weapons designed for mass shootings.

And since the laws were instituted, gun violence in Australia has dropped dramatically and it’s still falling. Between 1997 (the year after the restrictions were enacted) and 2007, the nation’s gun violence was cut by more than half. In 1997, guns were used in 24 percent of Australia’s homicides. By 2007, that statistic was just 11 percent.

For more information check out the following links:

http://www.bradycenter.org/

http://americansforresponsiblesolutions.org/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_politics_in_Australia

 

Posted in Arizona Politics, Firearms and Explosives, Firearms Legislation, Government, Gun Control, National Politics | Tagged , | Comments Off on What The NRA Doesn’t Want You To Know.

Mass Shootings and Gun Control — Podcast January 7, 2013


Gun Control: Will It Ever Be Possible? In the wake of the Newtown massacre, Gary LaMaster and Bill Timberman join Democratic Perspective co-hosts Mike Cosentino and Steve Williamson for a discussion of the rise in mass shootings in the United States. Have we actually reached a new political decision point on gun control, or will the status quo remain in place? We look at statistics on the rising number of gun massacres, the psychology of gun fetishists, open carry and shall issue legislation, the NRA’s role in the political gridlock on gun control, the real meaning of the Second Amendment, and the significance of the Australian ban on semi-automatic weapons.

Posted in Arizona Politics, Firearms and Explosives, Firearms Legislation, Gun Control, Law Enforcement, Mass Shootings, National Politics, Podcasts | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Mass Shootings and Gun Control — Podcast January 7, 2013

2012: the Political Year in Review — Podcast December 31, 2012


The Best of Times, the Worst of Times: 2012 in Review. The Democratic Perspective crew, led by co-hosts Mike Cosentino and Steve Williamson, look at some of the bests and worsts of political year 2012. Thanks to people who can’t read Mayan calendars, you missed out on the end of the world, but you don’t have to miss out on Democratic Perspective’s end of the year review.

Posted in Arizona Politics, Elections, National Politics, Podcasts | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on 2012: the Political Year in Review — Podcast December 31, 2012

Daryl Johnson Interview, Part 2 — Podcast December 24, 2012


Domestic Extremists: Who Are They, Why Are They So Angry, and How Do We Assess Their Potential for Violence? Daryl Johnson, a former senior analyst with the Department of Homeland Security, who now heads his own consulting firm, DT Analytics, returns to Democratic Perspective to continue the discussion from last week on the potential for home-grown terrorism. Gary LaMaster joins co-hosts Mike Cosentino and Steve Williamson for a follow-up with Mr. Johnson on domestic right-wing extremism and the potential it represents for acts of violence against the government and civil society.

Posted in Department of Homeland Security, Domestic Extremism, Domestic Terrorism, Firearms and Explosives, Government, Gun Control, Homeland Security, Interviews, Law Enforcement, Military, National Politics, Podcasts | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Daryl Johnson Interview, Part 2 — Podcast December 24, 2012

Daryl Johnson Interview — Podcast December 17, 2012


Playing Politics with Homeland Security: How a Republican Attempt to Embarrass the Obama Administration Weakened Our Safeguards Against Domestic Terrorism. Daryl Johnson, a former senior analyst with the Department of Homeland Security, explains how a 2009 report that he and his team authored on the potential threat of right-wing extremist groups was misused by Republican conservatives in an attempt to discredit the incoming Obama Administration. Democratic Perspective co-hosts Mike Cosentino and Steve Williamson investigate yet another phony Republican scandal, this time with real negative consequences not only for Mr. Johnson personally, but also for our national security.

Posted in Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms and Explosives, Department of Homeland Security, Domestic Extremism, Domestic Terrorism, Government, Interviews, Law Enforcement, National Politics, Podcasts | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

The Fiscal Cliff: What’s At Stake — Podcast November 10, 2012


The Fiscal Cliff: Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security. Democratic Perspective co-hosts Mike Cosentino and Steve Williamson continue their discussion from last week on the fiscal cliff negotiations in Washington. What do the Republicans and Democrats want, and in particular, why are the Republicans in the House so eager to hold Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security hostage to their extreme ideological agenda.

Posted in Affordable Care Act, Budget Negotiations, Deficit Reduction, Economic Policy, Entitlements, Fiscal Policy, Government, Medicaid, Medicare, National Politics, Podcasts, Taxes and the Deficit, U.S. Budget | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on The Fiscal Cliff: What’s At Stake — Podcast November 10, 2012