Putting The Community Back In The Community College.

No one seems to know when it happened…when the word community was removed from Yavapai College…or if it was ever part of the name in the first place. Since it was billed as a community college, maybe it was just understood. Nevertheless, at some point, the college seemed to stop serving communities in the Verde Valley. That fact became glaringly apparent when the Yavapai College Governing Board voted to approve a new 10-year plan that directs the vast majority of taxpayer money to Prescott and Prescott Valley. At the same time, the plan calls for closing the Chino Valley campus.  It calls for moving the nursing program from the Clarkdale campus to Prescott Valley. It also calls for “suspending” the Sedona Film School and selling the Sedona campus.

All of these moves would leave prospective students in the Verde Valley with fewer opportunities for higher education. If they choose to pursue a degree from Yavapai College, they would be forced to drive more than an hour each way over the mountain switchbacks. That may not seem like much of a deterrent to the College Administration and its Governing Board, but it presents an enormous obstacle to those who are employed and seeking higher education – especially those who are struggling to make ends meet.

Not surprisingly, that describes most of the people who seek degrees from community colleges.

Looking at national enrollment statistics, one discovers that attendance fluctuates in a counter-cyclical fashion to the economy. When the economy is down, community college attendance goes up, and vice versa. It’s a demonstration of the desire to improve one’s life. Yet, even though our economy is slowly improving, the circumstances for many aren’t. As a result, part-time enrollment in community colleges has increased.

National statistics to the contrary, Yavapai College administration and its Governing Board cite declining enrollment as the primary reason to abandon the Verde Valley. But enrollment figures are simply statistics, and we all know that there are lies, damn lies and statistics.

Enrollment is the product of many variables. As previously noted, the economy is one. Other factors are the community job market, the program offerings, the cost, the time of day classes are available, the history of the college placement service, the availability of affordable student housing for programs that hope to attract students from outside the immediate area, community relations, marketing, and more.

Any of these factors can explain the declining enrollment in the Verde Valley. One has to wonder, has the administration considered these factors? Or worse, has it manipulated them?

How can a film school hope to draw students to Sedona without student housing? Did the college really think there were enough students in the Verde Valley to sustain such a school? How can the Southwest Wine Center, which is intended to draw students from the entire Southwestern United States to Clarkdale, hope to succeed without student housing? Why do the Yavapai College administration and its Governing Board state that costs of building a dormitory in Clarkdale would be $30 million when their plans call for building a new dormitory in Prescott for $7 million?

Such questions not only make one wonder about the real intent of the administration. They make one wonder about the capabilities of the Yavapai College administration and its Governing Board.

Of course, there are other questions that require answers: How did the Governing Board think it could spend the vast majority of the Verde Valley’s $12 million in annual taxes in Prescott and Prescott Valley while closing the Sedona campus and removing many of the program offerings from the Clarkdale campus? And what prompted them to make such a decision with little to no input from Verde Valley residents? They should have known that such a decision would be controversial, if not deeply offensive.

Yet the administration and Governing Board seem genuinely puzzled by the predictable outrage. They now appear to be in full crisis management mode.

Posted in Arizona Politics, Continuing Education, Education, Education Policy, Oenology, Taxation, Viticulture | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Putting The Community Back In The Community College.

Civil Liberties and Public Advocacy: the Role of the ACLU — Podcast March 17, 2004


The ACLU vs. Governmental Overreach. Democratic Perspective welcomes Alessandra Soler Meetze, Executive Director of the ACLU for Arizona, and Michael Lacey, co-founder of the Phoenix New Times, for a discussion of the role of whistleblowers and  journalists in exposing the government’s abuses of civil liberties, and the American Civil Liberties Union’s role in defending the public against them. We win some, we lose some, but the defense of the Constitution and our inalienable rights as citizens continues.

Posted in Arizona Law Enforcement, Arizona Politics, Bigotry, Constitutional Issues, Government, Immigration, Intelligence Agencies, Interviews, Journalism, Justice System, Law Enforcement, Legal Issues, Marriage Equality, National Security, Podcasts, Surveillance Programs | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Civil Liberties and Public Advocacy: the Role of the ACLU — Podcast March 17, 2004

Yavapai College: Voices From Sedona — Podcast March 10, 2014


Yavapai College in Sedona: the Locals Speak. Continuing Democratic Perspective’s series on the Yavapai College controversy, co-hosts Mike Cosentino and Steve Williamson interview Jeremy Hawkes, Instructor at the Sedona Film School, Robin Weeks, Coordinator of Sedona’s Osher Lifelong Learning Institute (OLLI), and Paul Friedman, a long-time OLLI Facilitator, about the successes of their respective programs, their relationships with Yavapai College, and their hopes for the future.

Posted in Continuing Education, Education, Education Policy, Interviews, Local Politics, Podcasts | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Yavapai College: Voices From Sedona — Podcast March 10, 2014

Yavapai College: Is Local Control the Answer? — Podcast March 3, 2014


A Separate Verde Valley Administrative District for Yavapai College: Is It Feasible? Bob Oliphant and Ruth Wicks return to Democratic Perspective to address what they see as the flaws in the Yavapai College administration’s 10 year plan, and to discuss the potential advantages of local administrative control over the Sedona and Verde Valley campuses. With 30% of the county’s population, the Verde Valley, in their view, has the financial resources necessary to fully support local campuses, and, with the establishment of a separate administrative district, could retain local control of the educational program of the Verde Valley campuses without unnecessary duplication of support services on this side of the mountain.

Posted in Democratic Governance, Education, Education Policy, Podcasts, Taxation | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Yavapai College: Is Local Control the Answer? — Podcast March 3, 2014

Yavapai College Responds — Podcast February 24, 2014


The Yavapai College 10-Year Plan: Why It Is the Way It Is. Democratic Perspective‘s Mike Cosentino and Steve Williamson welcome Dr. Penelope (Penny) Wills, President of Yavapai College, and Harold Harrington, member of the Yavapai College District Governing Board from District 2, to address the controversy over the College’s 10 year Capital Improvements Master Plan approved by the Board in December, 2013. What is the rationale behind the plan? Is the consolidation of physical facilities in the Prescott/Prescott Valley area a reasonable response to projected economic and demographic trends in the county? If so, can the projected level of services to the eastern half of the county really be compatible with the transfer of tax revenues implied by the disparity in capital improvements expenditures expressed in the plan? The College responds.

Posted in Arizona Economy, Demographic Trends, Education, Education Policy, Podcasts | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Yavapai College Responds — Podcast February 24, 2014

One Solution To Many Problems.

A study co-authored by Aaron Sojourner, a professor of labor economics at the University of Minnesota, and Greg Duncan from the University of California-Irvine recently published in the Journal of Human Resources shows the path forward to solving some of the stickiest problems facing our nation.

Looking at the effect of providing high-quality preschool to children of impoverished families, the authors found that full-time, high-quality pre-school for children under the age of 3 could entirely eliminate the achievement gap between children from low-income familes and those from high-income families.

More important, the authors found that the impact of quality pre-school continued even if the children did not stay in quality care after age 3. At 5, about three-fourths of the gap remains closed. Entering kindergarten, there is little difference between low-income kids and kids from higher-income families. Even at age 8, five years after the program ended, some three-fifths of the IQ and math achievement gap remained closed. And the impact appears to continue for most children through age 18.

“Whatever happens during those first three years has an outsized impact,” said Sojourner. “So if you want to raise adult productivity, spend your next dollar there, in these early years.”

Although the cost of universal preschool may seem expensive, the results are more than worth it according to Sojourner. Indeed, another study by economist Art Rolnick and Rob Grunewald showed that the return on the public’s investment in preschool for low-income children was more than $16 for every dollar spent. Referring to Sojourner’s study, Rolnick said, “There is an overwhelming amount of evidence that is now building through Aaron’s work in particular to show that indeed we can expect a very, very high return to the public by investing in high quality early education for our children.”

The results of quality pre-school for impoverished children could have far-reaching impacts on our nation.

Not only could it help diminish the growing income divide between the rich and the poor (85 people now own more wealth than 3.5 billion people – more than all of Asia). It could help revitalize our shrinking middle class and the American dream. (Of all the advanced nations, the US has the least upward mobility. As a result, 42 percent of Americans born into poverty will not get out.)

Universal preschool could help lower our enormous prison population (the US has 5 percent of the world’s population and 25 percent of the world’s prisoners), since there is a direct link between those who lack education and those who wind up in prison. It could also help cut social programs, such as food stamps and other anti-poverty safety nets. It could help diminish the racial divides associated with poverty. It could improve our economy through increased productivity and increased tax revenues. And, combined with low-cost universal childcare, it could narrow the gender pay gap by enabling more women to hold full-time jobs. (For example, after Quebec instituted a low-cost universal childcare program, so many women entered the workforce the program more than paid for itself in tax revenues.)

Perhaps a statement by Nobel prize-winning economist, James Heckman, sums up the issue best. He said, “Universal preschool is not socialism. It’s fixing a market failure.  We’re saving money for everyone, including the taxpaying middle class and upper class. Right now they’re supporting prisons, health, special education in schools. The benefit is broadly shared. … It’s something that would actually accrue to the whole country.”

Given all of the potential benefits, is it any wonder that President Obama called for universal pre-kindergarten programs during his 2013 State of the Union address?

Posted in Capitalism, Class Conflict, Economic Policy, Economic Theory, Education, Education Policy, Government, Income Inequality, National Politics, Public Policy, Tax Revenues, Welfare, Women's Issues | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on One Solution To Many Problems.

Early Childhood Education: Great Returns From a Modest Investment — Podcast February 17, 2014


Pay Me Now or Pay Me Later: The Advantages of Investing in Early ChildHood Education. Democratic Perspective co-hosts Mike Cosentino and Steve Williamson are joined by Gary LaMaster, one of Democratic Perspective’s producers, to discuss an extensive study by the University of Minnesota and the University of California Irvine of the effects very early pre-school education (prior to age 3). Earlier studies had indicated that the advantages in learning and socialization conferred by such programs tended to dissipate as children got older. This study, which was much larger, and followed the children for a longer period, found just the opposite. If the results of this study are correct, the potential of such programs to solve many of our most persistent social problems — poverty, crime, and declining productivity — would seem to make investing in them a no-brainer. It’s certainly worth asking why studies such as these aren’t taken more seriously by the politicians who make our public policy.

Posted in Education, Education Policy, Jobs and Employment, Justice System, Podcasts, Privatization, Public Policy | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Early Childhood Education: Great Returns From a Modest Investment — Podcast February 17, 2014

The Yavapai College 10-Year Plan, Part II: Fixing What’s Broken — Podcast February 10, 2014


The Yavapai College 10-Year Plan: Robbing Peter To Pay Paul? Democratic Perspective‘s Mike Cosentino and Steve Williamson are joined once again by Robert Oliphant, ex-Board Member of Yavapai College for Yavapai County District 3, and Ruth Wicks, retired school and college counselor, former President and ex-Board Member of the Greater Verde Valley Chapter of the Yavapai College Foundation, for an extended discussion of the perceived inequities of the recently approved Yavapai College 10-Year Plan. If 30+% of the tax-based revenue for Yavapai College comes from the communities on the east side of the county, yet 98% of that revenue will be spent in Prescott and Prescott Valley on the west side, it is difficult to see how the taxpayers of eastern Yavapai County are being adequately served. If existing and previously planned campuses on the east side are closed and sold, or never opened, with the money recovered to be used for development in the Prescott area, it’s equally difficult to see how the 10-year plan can actually meet the desperate need for post-secondary and vocational education on the east side of the county. What can our voters and taxpayers do to fix what’s broken in the college’s 10-year plan?

Posted in Education, Education Policy, Government, Local Politics, Podcasts, Tax Revenues, Taxation | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on The Yavapai College 10-Year Plan, Part II: Fixing What’s Broken — Podcast February 10, 2014

The Yavapai College 10-Year Plan: A Question of Fairness — Podcast February 3, 2014


The Yavapai College 10-Year Plan: Is the Verde Valley Getting its Money’s Worth? Democratic Perspective‘s Mike Cosentino and  Steve Williamson are joined by Robert Oliphant, ex-Board Member of Yavapai College for Yavapai County District 3, Ruth Wicks, retired school and college counselor, former President and ex-Board Member of the Greater Verde Valley Chapter of the Yavapai College Foundation, and Jessica Williamson, Sedona City Councilor, for a discussion of the recently approved Yavapai College 10-Year Plan. With projected campus closings in the Verde Valley, and approximately 95% of future budget expenditures scheduled for Prescott and Prescott Valley, some residents of the Verde Valley have begun to question whether or not the services of the College are being provided to our side of the county in fair proportion to the tax revenues the College derives from us. With a little help from its friends, Democratic Perspective looks into the evidence.

Posted in Education, Education Policy, Government, Local Politics, Podcasts, Tax Revenues, Taxation | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The Yavapai College 10-Year Plan: A Question of Fairness — Podcast February 3, 2014

Born A Democrat.

On January 27, 2014, Democratic Perspective caught up with Carolyn Warner, former Superintendant of Public Instruction, Senate candidate, gubernatorial candidate and Democratic National Committeewoman. “I was born a Democrat,” said Warner. “My father was a state senator. I began handing out flyers for a candidate at age nine.”

Asked how politics has changed over the years, Warner replied, “Politics used to be fun.  It was serving…like serving on the school board. It was a time when your Republican friends were dear friends, like members of another religious denomination. Now people are feeling less in charge,” she continued. “The rate of change is so fast that people have lost their balance. America has become almost cancerous. Certain people in our body politic have turned on us.”

“The Republicans that we knew have fractured,” said Warner. “I think the Teapublicans are most dangerous of all. They are cloaked in hate. Without government, what do you have? Anarchy. And I’m not sure but that’s what they’re hoping for.”

However, Warner does feel that things are getting better. “The far edges are beginning to melt,” she said. “I’m beginning to see some of the real Republicans taking charge again. Like an icicle, it’s melting.”

“I’m more concerned about ALEC (American Legislative Exchange Council),” said Warner. “Unlimited dollars are available to build the hate agenda. ALEC has taken control of 17 states – complete control. Shockingly it’s a 501c3. ALEC meets three times a year.  They have various committees draft legislation that was initially pro-business, but is now part of the hate agenda.”

Turning to Arizona, Warner says she is encouraged by the upcoming elections. “Every Republican legislator has an opponent in the primary,” she said.

Warner is dismayed by what the Republican-controlled Arizona legislature has done to education. “I’m a mother of six and a Methodist. The Democratic Party and the Methodist belief system are almost interchangeable. The attack on the young and education is moving America into second class status.”

“The Arizona constitution says that education should be as inexpensive as possible,” she continued. “But Arizona’s funding on education is third from the bottom. Some states invest $10,000 per child more than Arizona. In Arizona, the student/teacher ratio is 21. The national average is 15. The legislature has cut $2.8 billion form education in the last 3 years.”

Warner had much, much more to say about politics in Arizona.  Listen to the entire interview on podcast.

Posted in Arizona Politics, Education, Education Policy, Political Polarization | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Born A Democrat.