More Than Enough Craziness To Go Around.

To celebrate the first Anniversary of Democratic Perspective, all of our members gathered in the studio to share information about the craziest bills in the Arizona State legislature. With so many from which to choose, we could have filled a day long program. But since our program is a half hour, we had to limit our choices to the most bizarre.

Put on your tin foil hat and get ready for some eye-popping craziness.

The first example of extremism is SB 1083 which would create the Arizona Special Missions Unit, a volunteer militia to be directed by the legislature and the governor. After 5 whole days of training, they would be given the power to apprehend and arrest and to seize property. The bill would also grant immunity to Unit members while “on duty.” In truth, this is little more than an armed group of vigilantes. The bill provides a budget of $1.4 million. But the potential cost to the state’s image is many times more.

HB 2563 mandates that public schools offer courses on the influence of the Bible. As Bill Timberman points out, it would seem in direct conflict with the Constitution’s establishment clause guaranteeing separation of church and state. “Schools are now going to be required to show the importance of the Bible in the US,” said Bill. “But this is a very diverse country, so what about the Book of Mormon? And with all the people of Chinese descent, why not the Analects of Confucious?”

SB 1507 is a Tea Party authored bill which would shut down any government initiative to reduce pollution and improve energy efficiency in cities, counties and the state. “It’s a bill being pushed by Arizona “Tea Party” members,” says Mike Cosentino. The bill is based on a conspiracy theory about the 1992 United Nations Rio Declaration on Evironment and Development which House Minority Leader Chad Campbell calls “the most ludicrous bill I’ve ever seen in six years in the Legislature.” Campbell says, “With this legislation, you could pretty much shut down any form of government sustainability.”

The bill stems from the so-called Agenda 21 Conspiracy, a Tea Party theory that the Rio conference represents an attempted UN takeover of our country.

Yet another anti-federal government bill would give Arizona the power to seize 25 million acres of federal land around the Grand Canyon for mining and exploitation of other resources.

Expanding on the anti-federal government theme, Steve Williamson focused on HB 2815 which would allow taxpayers to apply for tax credits equivalent to the cost of adhering to laws imposing excessive regulation. In other words, if you have to comply with a federal law regulating pollution, you presumably could apply for tax credits to repay you for the compliance. This bill is one of the conservative Goldwater Institute’s contributions to the legislative agenda.

Chuck Williamson addressed the bills that would further cut into education by saying, “If you look at states that have the best business, they are all high-tax states that have seed money available, good education, and applicable expertise. That’s why they often locate near college campuses. Good businesses don’t move for a low tax rate. The businesses that do are like call centers that cause you to compete with countries like India. That’s the exact opposite of what’s needed. We need to create small businesses that grow and create good jobs. The way to help business is to have well-educated people for them to hire.”

Dick Searle chose to talk about bills which would allow more mining in the Grand Canyon. “There is no real ban on mining in the Grand Canyon now,” said Dick. “There are already 2,000 mining claims in the area. Thanks to an 1872 mining law, foreign companies are extracting the resources and paying virtually nothing in return. I’m really concerned about the future of the environment.”

Bill pointed out that many of these bills are intended to reinterpret clauses in the Constitution that conservatives don’t like. “They want to give states supremacy over the federal government,” he said. “If I were a judge looking at the Bible bill, the intent seems to mandate religious instruction that’s useful for only a portion of the population.”

Of course, there are self-serving bills such as HB 2557 which redefines intersections. The bill was pushed by Republican Senator Frank Antenori after he received a ticket for deliberately running a red light.

SB 1231 sponsored by Senate President Steve Pierce, appropriates $250,000 to allow the state Attorney General to sue the US Forest Service for the lack of forest thinning.

And, in a new development, the legislature has passed HB 2729 to allow guns in all public buildings unless the building owner provides a guard, metal detector and gun lockers at each entrance. Looking at the consequences for just one county, if Maricopa wants to keep guns out of its buildings, it will cost $11.3 million for equipment and $19.5 million in ongoing costs.

Also, Gov. Jan Brewer has signed legislation making it a crime for a doctor to perform an abortion at or beyond 20 weeks. Doctors who violate the law could not only lose their medical licenses but also be sent to jail for up to six months.

For all of the sordid details about this legislative session, visit www.azleg.gov/bills.asp.

 

Posted in Arizona Politics, Government | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on More Than Enough Craziness To Go Around.

Democratic Perspective’s First Anniversary — Podcast April 9, 2012


The Republican Wrecking Crew:  Not surprisingly, people who don’t believe in government aren’t very good at governing. On Democratic Perspective’s first anniversary show, co-hosts Mike Cosentino and Steve Williamson are joined by VVID members Gary LaMaster, Dick Searle, Bill Timberman and Chuck Williamson in a dissection of some of our favorite bad bills from the Republican-dominated Arizona State Legislature. If you can laugh at horror movies, folks, this is the show for you.

Posted in Arizona Politics, Economic Policy, Education, Environment, Podcasts | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Democratic Perspective’s First Anniversary — Podcast April 9, 2012

Reclaiming the Sedona Fire District Board — Podcast April 2, 2012


A Matter of Trust:  On Democratic Perspective’s inaugural half-hour show, Sedona Fire District Board candidates Corrie Cooperman, Nazih Hazime and Diane Schoen discuss their disappointments with current Board policies, and speak about what they would do to bring more responsible management to the District. Their opponents, who were elected in 2010 on a platform of fiscal responsibility, have instead spent tens of thousands of dollars on an unnecessary audit, undermined public confidence in the professionals who run the Fire Department, and embraced cost-cutting measures which could ultimately endanger public safety. It’s time for a change.

Posted in Arizona Politics, Government, Interviews, Podcasts | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Reclaiming the Sedona Fire District Board — Podcast April 2, 2012

Reclaiming The Sedona Fire District Board.

For its very first half hour program on KAZM-AM, Democratic Perspective chose to host Sedona Fire Board candidates Corrie Cooperman, Nazih Hazime and Diane Schoen.

To understand this election, you first need to know a little history. In 2008, two Board members were elected on a platform of fiscal responsibility. Then, in 2010, two Tea Party candidates also promising fiscal responsibility won seats on the Board.

Almost immediately, problems surfaced based on their ideology and apparent distrust of people who work for the public. The Board is accused of violating open meeting laws, destroying department morale and compromising quality of first responders. Moreover, instead of saving money, the Board has squandered it by ordering a forensic audit and racking up tens of thousands in legal bills.

As a result, Cooperman, Hazime and Schoen are facing off against Dave Blauert, Charles Christenson, and Phyllis Erick in a recall election.

We began our conversation by asking the candidates to say a little about themselves and why they’re running for offic. The first to respond was Chief Nazih Hazime who is running against Charles Christenson. “I ran for Fire Chief and was chosen as the result of a $10,000 process and served two years as the Sedona Fire Chief,” said Hazime. “I think it only makes sense to have someone with fire-fighting experience on the Board.”

Diane Schoen responded by saying she’s running against Fire Board Chairman, Dave Blauert. Schoen described herself as an Arizona native who has lived in Sedona for 9 years. “I’ve served on a school board and on a public commission. I’m currently President of the Jewish Community of Sedona,” she said. “I’m running because the current Board members do not listen to the community. The democratic process is important to me.”

Last, Corey Cooperman stated that she is running against Phyllis Erick. “I am concerned quality is eroding,” Cooperman said. “I am a Registered Nurse concerned that the Board wants to privatize ambulance service. Quality will go down. We want well-trained people to respond.”

As previously stated, money is one of the primary reasons for the recall. Following the resignation of Chief Hazime, the Fire Board is accused of spending $30,000 to select a new chief and choosing the most expensive bid for the forensic audit, awarding the job to McCladery at a cost of $190,000. (Incidentally, McCladery had never before audited a fire department.)

“The board is quoted as saying the books had been cooked,” said Schoen. “Yet the audit confirmed that the department was adequately staffed and equipped. No wrongdoing was found.”

“If you think something is wrong, you should work with the Chief,” added Hazime. “There were some things that needed to be done. There were some personnel issues. Some staff and equipment needed to be eliminated. But they should have let the Chief take care of it.”
Instead, the Board ignored Chief Hazime and refused to communicate with him.

“The Board micro-managed,” said Schoen. “They did a research project without telling the current Chief. You hire a professional to run the organization. You are a policy board. Is it any wonder morale is very low.”

“We have lost a Fire Marshall, the head of H.R., and the Finance Manager,” added Cooperman. “Those people were hired almost immediately by other departments. Chief Hazime was hired within weeks by the Verde Valley Fire Department.” But even though Hazime now serves with the VVFD, he notes, “I’m Verde Valley Fire Chief, but a Sedona resident. I feel my work wasn’t finished. To come back and serve would be an honor.”

“I became more interested as money was being spent,” said Schoen. Cooperman agreed, “The red flag for me was privatizing the ambulance service. Then I started going to meetings. The legal costs have been $140,000,” she said. “The typical cost should be $45,000 per year. The attorney of 27 years has been fired because they didn’t like his advice. Now they want to spend $120,000 for a fingerprint system to clock in and out. I checked it out and it’s the kind of system that’s usually only used by casinos,” she concluded.

Mailing of early ballots will begin April 19. The election will be completed on May 15. You’ll find more information on the subject at the following websites:

http://www.sfdrecall.com/sfdrecall/__Home_Page.html

http://thesedonacitizen.com/fire-board-election-2012/

Posted in Arizona Politics, Government, Interviews | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Reclaiming The Sedona Fire District Board.

Paul Lenze Interview — Podcast March 26, 2012


The Last Resort: Middle-East expert Dr. Paul Lenze, of Northern Arizona University, talks with Democratic Perspective co-hosts Michael Cosentino and Stephen Williamson about the consequences of military actions against Iran, consequences which have often been overlooked or downplayed by powerful advocates in the Republican Party, in the Israeli government, and in its allied lobbying groups in the U.S.

Despite what many of our fellow citizens seem to believe, war is never the first tool a government should reach for when its interests are thwarted, even when its military is the most powerful in the world. If what happened in Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan was not enough to convince U.S. decision makers that wars of choice are a bad idea, there’s a good chance that Iran will be next on the list for military action. If so, Dr. Lenze argues that the consequences may once again be worse than we bargained for.

Posted in Foreign Affairs, Government, Interviews, Middle East, Military, National Politics, Podcasts | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Paul Lenze Interview — Podcast March 26, 2012

Why Military Action In Iran Has To Be Option Of Last Resort.

To address the Republican-led drumbeat for war with Iran, Democratic Perspective turned to Middle Eastern expert, Dr. Paul Lenze of Northern Arizona University.

We started by asking Dr. Lenze about the history between Iran and the US. “The bad blood started in 1953 when the US and British tried to overthrow the democratically-elected government of Mohammad Mosaddegh,” he replied. “Mosaddegh had nationalized the Iranian oil fields which had been under British control. Following the overthrow, we helped install Mohammad-Reza Shah Pahlavi and provided billions in military assistance,” Lenze continued.

“In 1979, the Shah was overthrown by the Grand Ayatollah Ruholla Khomeini, who was proclaimed Supreme Leader,” said Lenze. “Khomeini set up the Council of Guardians, a democratically-elected Parliament and a Judiciary. The Council, comprised of clerics, can overrule the government. As a result, several factions have developed in Iran.”

“Iran sees itself as regional hegemonist,” Lenze stated. “But Persian influence has always been countered by Arabs. And the US has supported Arab dictators.”

When asked about Iran’s nuclear ambitions, Lenze responded, “Iraq and Libya gave up their nuclear ambitions and were overrun. The US is now on Iran’s western border in Afghanistan and on its eastern border in Iraq.” (In addition, the US has bases in Kuwait, Turkey and in the Persian Gulf.)

“As a result, Iran feels threatened by the US and Israel,” he continued.

But there is some good news according to Lenze. “Iran has signed the non-proliferation treaty opening itself up to inspections,” he said.

As for the possibility of a multi-national attack such as those in Iraq and Afghanistan, Lenze stated, “I don’t see the US directly out in front. The US needs to focus on diplomacy and reassure Israel. I don’t see us offensively going to war with Iran.”

We then asked what would happen if Israel attacked Iran’s nuclear facilities. “If Israel attacks,” Lenze said, “Iran would likely funnel money to Hezbollah and Hamas for attacks on Israel. They might also offer military assistance to the Shia in southern Iraq and Afghainstan. And they would attack US interests. If a war continued for 6 months, it might even draw China and Russia into it.”

“Military has to be the option of last resort,” he concluded.

Posted in Foreign Affairs, Government, Interviews, Middle East, Military, National Politics | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Why Military Action In Iran Has To Be Option Of Last Resort.

Jo Kelleher Interview — Podcast March 19, 2012


Eternal Vigilance: Continuing Democratic Perspective’s series on the Republican war on women, Jo Kelleher, long-time educator and current member of the Governing Board of the Chino Valley Unified School District, describes the history of the struggle for equal rights, the humiliations inflicted on women by a political system which infantilizes them, and why, as she puts it, the price of being a woman is eternal vigilance.

Posted in Arizona Politics, Elections, Health Care, Interviews, National Politics, Podcasts, Women's Rights | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Jo Kelleher Interview — Podcast March 19, 2012

The GOP’s War On Women, Part 2.

On March 19, Democratic Perspective continued its series on the GOP’s War on Women with Jo Kelleher, a long-time educator and current member of the Chino Valley Unified School District Governing Board.

She began by referring to a recent op-ed in the New York Times featuring former Governor Michael Dukakis who was one of the key negotiators on contraception between Planned Parenthood and the church 50 years ago. “I’m glad to hear from Governor Dukakis,” said Kelleher. “I thought we already won this battle 100 years ago.”

Reflecting on her own experiences, “In 1968, I was 25 and newly engaged. I remember to this day that I had to show that I was engaged to get contraceptives,” said Kelleher. “Women were humiliated to even go into the pharmacy to ask. But that’s nothing compared to the humiliation today.”

“It’s an issue of control,” she continued. “Men have been fascinated with women’s reproductive system and want to control it.”

When asked about HB2625, the contraception bill being considered in the Arizona legislature, she said, “I think they understand women will not tolerate a ban, so they’re doing this. As the ACLU says, it goes beyond the right to practice faith. These Republicans want to impose their religious beliefs on others. In a perverse way, I’m kind of glad this came up because it gets us back on our horses,” Kelleher continued. “The price of being a woman is eternal vigilance.”

Kelleher also pointed to another Republican bill, HB2800, which would virtually eliminate Planned Parenthood’s ability to help poor women such as students, single mothers, and young marrieds. “It will now be legal in Arizona and South Dakota for doctors to lie to women by telling them their fetus is healthy, even if it isn’t. The idea is to keep women from considering an abortion,” she said. “And the law will protect those doctors from lawsuits.”

She calls the attacks on Planned Parenthood misguided. “Of all the funds collected by Planned Parenthood, 35 percent is spent on contraception,” she said. “The majority of dollars are used for women’s health care. Only 3 percent of Planned Parenthood’s budget is spent on abortion, and there’s no comingling of funds. Margaret Sanger and others took risks to start Planned Parenthood. We need to stand up for it and all women’s rights,” Kelleher concluded.

To stop more of these assaults on women, Kelleher encourages women to get involved. “Women must participate in the emails circulating and get out and vote,” she said. “If there’s no Democratic candidate, look for moderate Republicans.”

Posted in Arizona Politics, Elections, Health Care, National Politics, Women's Rights | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on The GOP’s War On Women, Part 2.

Harriet Young Interview — Podcast March 12, 2012


The War on Women: In its first broadcast in a continuing series covering the current assault on women’s rights, Democratic Perspective talks to Harriet Young, Interim Chair of the Arizona Democratic Party, President of the Flagstaff Branch of the American Association of University Women, and long-time advocate for reproductive freedom and equal rights.

Posted in Interviews, National Politics, Podcasts, Women's Rights | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Harriet Young Interview — Podcast March 12, 2012

The War On Women.

On March 12, Democratic Perspective began a series on the War on Women. Our first guest for the series was the interim Chair of the Arizona Democratic Party, Harriet Young. Harriet has taught American politics and institutions at Northern Arizona University since 1992. She is president of the Flagstaff Branch of the American Association of University Women. She has worked for the Coconino County Democratic Party. And recently, she was honored by Planned Parenthood for her work to help elect pro-choice candidates for public office.

We began our interview by asking Harriet about the current controversy over contraception and Planned Parenthood. “Planned Parenthood lets women manage their own lives,” she replied. “Control of reproduction equals political freedom. Of course, women also have the freedom to not use contraception. They’re free to make their own decisions about contraception and not listen to Catholic bishops.”

She said that the decision to make employer health insurance plans pay for contraceptives, even those for Catholic organizations, is justified. “Catholic institutions such as universities and hospitals are filled with non-Catholic women,” she noted. “They include technical fields staffed by highly trained women.”

Young said that the problem goes much deeper. “Republicans are redefining rape and denying health care to women,” she said. “Who benefits? Why should poor people have to choose between sex and pregnancy?”

When asked why more women aren’t outraged, Harriet responded, “You weren’t at the event last Thursday night. There were hundreds of women and men who got together to raise funds for Planned Parenthood and they were very vocal about the issues. I can tell you, women will be engaged in the elections.”

She labeled the attempts to control reproductive freedom as a Republican political ploy. “The two-person family income has been necessary for decades,” she said. “That also made contraception necessary. But in the 70s, Paul Weyrich, Pat Robertson and others decided there weren’t enough conservatives to win elections so they created a marriage between religious conservatives and the GOP. That has led to the nonsense we see today.”

“We’re seeing 13th century standards pushed by Santorum and Gingrich,” Young continued. “Conservatives and religion didn’t like women’s lib, so they’re trying to roll back the clock. Gingrich even wants to roll back child labor laws,” she said.
Harriet cited yet another troubling policy of Republican politicians. “They’re cutting headstart programs,” she said. “Since both parents often need to work, that creates a long-term societal problem. We know that children’s brains are formed by interaction. Without that the kids never catch up.”

“Republicans are even going after the elderly poor, two-thirds of which are women,” she said. “They’ve cut funding for Meals on Wheels. It’s part of the Tea Party philosophy of pitting what they consider the deserving (the wealthy) against the undeserving (the poor).”

Posted in Health Care, Interviews, National Politics, Women's Rights | Tagged , , | Comments Off on The War On Women.