The Real Victims Of The Fiscal Cliff.

Since Tea Party Republicans led our nation to a fiscal cliff in 2011 by refusing to raise the debt ceiling without lowering the deficit, our economy has been held hostage. Unable to agree on budget negotiations, Congress instituted sequestration cuts intended to be so onerous that neither side would want them to take effect.

More than a year later, negotiations still have not been completed. As a result, come January 1, we will see massive cuts to the defense budget as well as social programs, including the so-called “entitlements” unless the two parties can reach agreement on alternatives.

If the cuts take effect, those who created our deficits will not be the ones to suffer the brunt of the cuts. Rather, almost all of the burden will be borne by the poor and the middle class.

The first ones to experience the pain will be the 2.1 million unemployed who will lose unemployment benefits at the end of this year. In addition, there will be cuts to Social Security and Medicare which will punish the elderly. Numerous other social safety nets will also see cuts affecting millions more of the working poor. And the proposed cuts to defense will be borne by middle class workers who will likely lose their jobs.

Moreover, the fiscal cliff will almost certainly send our economy spiraling downward into a deep recession which will have serious consequences for everyone except the very wealthy.

One need only to look at Greece, Italy, England and others to see the consequences of austerity programs such as that advocated by Tea Party Republicans. The results have included deep recessions, riots and political upheaval.

It would be the height of foolishness for Congress to follow these countries over the cliff. Certainly, our budget deficits and federal debt are of long-term concern. But they do not constitute a crisis. As the economy has improved, the Obama administration has already begun to cut the deficit. That should continue. But it is economic suicide to make massive cuts in a weak economy. Instead, our government should be focused on strengthening the economy and creating jobs. Once the economy is on solid footing, both revenue and cuts should accelerate.

That is the recommendation of most economists. Unfortunately, the GOP seems unwilling to accept the advice.

For example, the GOP proposal recommends that eligibility for Medicare be increased to age 67. According to a Kaiser Foundation study, this will save approximately $5.7 billion per year. Unfortunately, the same study estimates that it will also result in $8.2 billion per year in increased costs. Why? Because seniors without health insurance tend to put off surgeries and other medical care until they are eligible for Medicare. The longer they put off treatment, the more expensive the treatment becomes.

At very best, raising the age for eligibility will simply transfer the costs from the government to those who can least afford it. And the Kaiser Foundation study concludes that increasing the age of eligibility will have no affect on the sustainability of Medicare. The only way to fix Medicare is to contain the costs of our out-of-control healthcare system which ranks as the most expensive in the world. The Affordable Care Act is a good start toward that goal.

As for Social Security, it has not contributed one dollar to the deficit or debt. In fact, Congress has repeatedly borrowed money from the trust fund in order to pay for other things.

The reality of the fiscal cliff is that it is entirely manufactured by the Tea Party, Karl Rove and Fox News Channel, along with their wealthy sponsors such as the Koch Brothers, Sheldon Adelson, Peter G. Peterson and corporate-led front groups who are determined to privatize federal programs such as Social Security in order to further line their pockets.

Posted in Affordable Care Act, Budget Negotiations, Deficit Reduction, Economic Policy, Entitlements, Financial Crisis, Fiscal Policy, Government, Health Care, Medicare, Military, National Debt Ceiling, National Politics, Privatization, Social Security, U.S. Budget, Unemployment | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on The Real Victims Of The Fiscal Cliff.

The Fiscal Cliff: What It Is and Isn’t — Podcast December 3, 2012


The Fiscal Cliff: Tax Rates, Entitlements, and the Republican Clown Show. Democratic Perspective co-hosts Mike Cosentino and Steve Williamson dissect the so-called fiscal cliff. What it is, where it got its name, and what happens if or when we go over it. As with all negotiations between Democrats and Republicans these days, the negotiations concerned with future tax revenues and expenditures are based at least in part on false premises, and as a consequence, have been predictably bitter, protracted, and crippled by an ideological catechism that — on the Republican side at least — seems to have been written for an economic universe ruled by pure fantasy. As some cynic once said, it’s hard to know whether we’re being ruled by smart people who are putting us on, or by imbeciles who really mean it.

Posted in Arizona Budget, Budget Negotiations, Deficit Reduction, Economic Policy, Entitlements, Fiscal Policy, Government, Medicare, Monetary Policy, National Debt Ceiling, National Politics, Podcasts, Social Security | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on The Fiscal Cliff: What It Is and Isn’t — Podcast December 3, 2012

Desperately Seeking Scandal — Podcast November 26, 2012


Desperately Seeking Scandal: Democratic Perspective co-hosts Mike Cosentino and Steve Williamson discuss the Republican Party’s use of scandal-mongering as a political tool. It doesn’t bother adherents of the Republican right wing if they can’t find a real scandal in Washington, the machinery is already in place to invent one whenever they think they need one. Fox News doesn’t care that voter fraud doesn’t really exist, that the Solyndra business plan made sense in the solar panel market as it was when they received a federal loan, or that Susan Rice’s early comments on the murder of four Americans in Benghazi accurately reflected what was known at the time she made them. They’re not in the truth business, they’re in the obstruction business.

Posted in Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms and Explosives, Foreign Affairs, Government, Media Campaigns, Middle East, National Politics, Podcasts, Scandal Mongering | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Desperately Seeking Scandal — Podcast November 26, 2012

Assessing the Robin Hood Tax — Podcast November 19, 2012


Assessing the Robin Hood Tax: Democratic Perspective co-hosts Mike Cosentino and Steve Williamson look at the proposed Financial Transaction Tax, otherwise known as the Robin Hood Tax, that would levy a 0.5% tax on financial trading transactions. How much revenue would it generate, what effect would it have on the securities and bond markets, and how could it be instituted in such a way as to prevent securities traders from moving offshore?

Posted in Deficit Reduction, Economic Policy, Financial Sector, Fiscal Policy, Investment Banking, Monetary Policy, National Politics, Podcasts, Tax and Investment Policy, Taxes and the Deficit, U.S. Budget | Tagged | Comments Off on Assessing the Robin Hood Tax — Podcast November 19, 2012

Assessing The Robin Hood Tax.

With the so-called “Fiscal Cliff” looming, Democratic Perspective hosts, Mike Cosentino and Steve Williamson, examined one of the most promising options for raising revenue – the Financial Transaction Tax (AKA The Robin Hood Tax).

The tax is supported by a thousand economists along with Warren Buffet and Bill Gates. Additionally, the tax already exists in 28 countries. The latest to begin implement ing the tax is France. Even the Vatican supports the idea.

The .5 percent tax would not affect normal bank activities, so it would have little effect on ordinary people. Mostly, it will impact high-speed trading – the trades made by computers to take advantage of minor fluctuations in share prices. Not traditional “buy and hold” investments.

Previously, the tax was proposed in the US House of Representatives by Rep. Chaka Fattah of Pennsylvania but never got out of committee. A similar bill was also proposed in the Senate by Senator Tom Harkin of Iowa. Again, it never got out of committee. But similar bills have surfaced again in both houses of Congress.

Details are yet to be worked out, but the Center for Economic and Policy Research estimates that a financial transaction tax could generate $177 billion per year. Other estimates say it would raise about 20 times the amount of revenue that would be collected from the so-called Buffet Rule which would allow the Bush tax cuts expire for those with adjusted incomes of $250,000 or more.

Even though, there has been little political will to institute the transaction tax as yet, the idea is gaining steam. The biggest obstacle is that it opponents feel that it must be global – that all of the world’s advanced economies would have to adopt the tax. Otherwise, they fear, investors would just move their investments to countries without the tax.

But since nations such as Argentina, Austria, Brazil, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Portugal, South Africa, Slovenia, Spain and Venezuela support the tax, it would seem that it is close to becoming a reality.

Posted in Deficit Reduction, Economic Policy, Financial Sector, Fiscal Policy, Investment Banking, Monetary Policy, National Politics, Tax and Investment Policy, Taxes and the Deficit, U.S. Budget | Tagged | Comments Off on Assessing The Robin Hood Tax.

Lessons From The 2012 Election.

Not surprisingly, election results were the topic this week on Democratic Perspective. As with most elections, there was good news and bad news.

The good news was President Obama’s overwhelming win with 302 electoral votes. The bad news was that Dr. Richard Carmona apparently lost his bid to become a US Senator.

The good news was that Democrats won 5 of Arizona’s Congressional Districts. The bad news was that all three Democratic candidates for the Corporation Commission lost.

The good news was that Democrats broke the super majority in the Arizona State Legislature. The bad news was that all three of our LD-6 candidates (Ballard, Chabin and LeFevre) lost. Even worse news was that Sheriff Joe Arpaio was re-elected in Maricopa County! And the worst news of all was that, a week after the election, tens of thousands of votes still had not been counted in Arizona revealing an apparently dysfunctional electoral system.

Looking at the pre-election polls, it was obvious that the most accurate predictor of the election was Nate Silver’s 538 Blog. He not only predicted the outcome of the presidential race. He predicted the number of electoral votes. He even called every US Senate race with the single exception of North Dakota’s.

The Republican pollsters all got it wrong, including the right-leaning Rasmussen Poll; even the famed Gallup Poll.

The lessons from the election were many: Women, Latinos and African-Americans voted overwhelmingly for President Obama and Democratic candidates. The Democratic ground game is both more committed and sophisiticated than the Republicans’. And Republican voter suppression efforts backfired. In Florida and Ohio, voters (especially minorities) stood in line for up to 8 hours to vote.

In Arizona, it was clear that despite months of canvassing and calling, people ignored issues and voted along party lines. A great example was the sovereignty proposition. Voters overwhelmingly rejected the measure, yet they elected the proposition’s author, Chester Crandall. Also, in LD-6, voters elected the legislator who proposed turning northern Arizona into a nuclear waste dump.

The only possible conclusion is that, in rural northern Arizona, especially in the Verde Valley, voters give little consideration to anything except party affiliation.

Posted in Arizona Politics, Elections, National Politics, Polling | Tagged | Comments Off on Lessons From The 2012 Election.

Elections 2012: The Good, The Bad, and The Inevitable — Podcast November 12, 2012


The Vote in 2012: Reviewing the Outcome. Democratic Perspective looks at the results of the 2012 elections. What did they tell us about the current and future state of the electorate in the United States? Whose polls most accurately predicted the outcome? Are the demographic changes reflected in President Obama’s re-election real? Did the Citizens United Supreme Court decision have as much effect on the outcome of Congressional and state races as pundits predicted? Is Arizona out of step with the rest of the country? Co-hosts Mike Cosentino and Steve Williamson, along with Gary LaMaster, Dick Searle, and Bill Timberman take on all of these questions and more.

Posted in Arizona Politics, Campaign Finance, Citizens United, Elections, Government, Media Campaigns, National Politics, Podcasts, Polling | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Elections 2012: The Good, The Bad, and The Inevitable — Podcast November 12, 2012

Politics, Politics — Podcast November 5, 2012


Politics, Politics: Election Eve Thoughts. With Mike Cosentino taking the day-before-election-day off, host Steve Williamson and the rest of the Democratic Perspective editorial crew,  Gary LaMaster, Dick Searle, and Bill Timberman discuss the pros, the cons, the possibilities, the probabilities, and the likely consequences of this Tuesday’s elections.

Posted in Arizona Politics, Elections, National Politics, Podcasts | Tagged | Comments Off on Politics, Politics — Podcast November 5, 2012

Arizona’s Solar Team: “Watchdogs. Not Lap Dogs.”

Arizona’s Corporation Commissioners are some of the most powerful executives in the state. To learn more about the candidates for the commission, Democratic Perspective hosted first-time candidate Marcia Busching and incumbent Paul Newman. Along with incumbent Sandra Kennedy, they are running as the Solar Team.

Most people know that the commission regulates utilities, but we began our interview by asking what the commission does. Busching responded by saying, “One of the obligations of the Corporation Commission is to help investors who have been defrauded when they’ve purchased securities. We help collect their money back. In 2011, the Corporation Commission collected nearly $28 million for investors.”

Asked why she and the other members of the Solar Team have chosen to run for the office, Busching replied, “First, we want oversight…to be a utility watchdog, not a lap dog…to make sure we have reasonable utility rates. Second, we want Arizona to become a leader in renewable energy and to achieve energy independence. And third, we really want to encourage a job creating business environment with more solar jobs. We have 27 solar manufacturers in this state, and we really want to have more.”

The Solar Team is running a very competitive campaign despite the fact that their Republican opponents were found in violation of election laws by the Clean Elections Commission for spending $250,000 to attack the Democratic candidates before the primaries. They were fined $29,000 as a result of their actions.

That issue aside, Busching said, “The biggest difference between the Solar Team and the opposition is that we really see a bright future for Arizona. We see the Corporation Commission as a job creator; seeing the ability to be a leader in solar; seeing the opportunity to have energy independence; and, at the same time, making sure that we keep people’s rates reasonable and responsible. The other side has been absolutely chipping away at the renewable energy standards that were set five years ago. They have reduced rebates. They want to make sure that every coal-fired plant that we have in this state can continue to operate.”

In comparing the various sources of energy, Busching reported, “According to the APS resource report, which came out in April of this year, the installed cost of kilowatt hour of nuclear is $6,000. Coal is $3,500. Solar and wind are $2,500. And natural gas is $1,000. If you compare apples to apples, solar and wind are much less expensive than coal or nuclear.”

Busching continued, “The delivered costs including capital, fuel, operation and maintenance, fuel efficiency, capacity and transmission costs, nuclear comes in at $160 per megawatt hour, coal at $150, and solar and gas are just about equal at $100 per megawatt hour.”

Paul Newman added, “The study suggests that Arizona should be investing in renewable energy, both solar and wind. This is not only an environmental issue. It’s an economic issue.”

Asked about the commission’s 30% cut in rebates for solar, Newman replied, “Republicans have been cutting back on rebates. They’ve been cutting back on efficiency. And they’ve been cutting back on our power. They’re in a regulator role, but they don’t believe in government. We need to get back to a bi-partisan commission and, hopefully, we can do that.”

With regard to the experience of running for office, Busching said, “No regrets, the campaign has been a wonderful experience.”

“I echo Marcia’s words,” said Newman. “This is a very, very critical election. It’s a tipping point, that’s for sure. It’s going to be a close election. We can’t predict what will happen. But I think that we’ve gotten our message out…to bring jobs to Arizona, to bring energy independence, and to be a consumer watchdog.”

Posted in Arizona Politics, Elections, Energy Policy, Environment, Interviews, Renewable Energy | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Arizona’s Solar Team: “Watchdogs. Not Lap Dogs.”

Marcia Busching and Paul Newman Interview — Podcast October 29, 2012


The Arizona Solar Team 2012: Democratic Candidates for the Arizona Corporation Commission. Democratic Perspective co-hosts Mike Cosentino and Gary LaMaster interview Democratic candidates for the Arizona Corporation Commission,  Marcia Busching and incumbent Commissioner Paul Newman. Together with Sandra Kennedy — also an incumbent Commissioner — they are  running for the Commission as The Arizona Solar Team 2012. Marcia and Paul explain why solar power, which is now cost competitive with nuclear and non-renewable energy sources, is the right choice for future energy development in Arizona, and why the Republican members of the Commission have done everything they can to stall its development.

Posted in Arizona Politics, Energy Policy, Interviews, Jobs and Employment, Podcasts, Regulatory Agencies, Renewable Energy | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Marcia Busching and Paul Newman Interview — Podcast October 29, 2012