Mass Shootings and Gun Control — Podcast January 7, 2013


Gun Control: Will It Ever Be Possible? In the wake of the Newtown massacre, Gary LaMaster and Bill Timberman join Democratic Perspective co-hosts Mike Cosentino and Steve Williamson for a discussion of the rise in mass shootings in the United States. Have we actually reached a new political decision point on gun control, or will the status quo remain in place? We look at statistics on the rising number of gun massacres, the psychology of gun fetishists, open carry and shall issue legislation, the NRA’s role in the political gridlock on gun control, the real meaning of the Second Amendment, and the significance of the Australian ban on semi-automatic weapons.

Posted in Arizona Politics, Firearms and Explosives, Firearms Legislation, Gun Control, Law Enforcement, Mass Shootings, National Politics, Podcasts | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Mass Shootings and Gun Control — Podcast January 7, 2013

2012: the Political Year in Review — Podcast December 31, 2012


The Best of Times, the Worst of Times: 2012 in Review. The Democratic Perspective crew, led by co-hosts Mike Cosentino and Steve Williamson, look at some of the bests and worsts of political year 2012. Thanks to people who can’t read Mayan calendars, you missed out on the end of the world, but you don’t have to miss out on Democratic Perspective’s end of the year review.

Posted in Arizona Politics, Elections, National Politics, Podcasts | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on 2012: the Political Year in Review — Podcast December 31, 2012

Daryl Johnson Interview, Part 2 — Podcast December 24, 2012


Domestic Extremists: Who Are They, Why Are They So Angry, and How Do We Assess Their Potential for Violence? Daryl Johnson, a former senior analyst with the Department of Homeland Security, who now heads his own consulting firm, DT Analytics, returns to Democratic Perspective to continue the discussion from last week on the potential for home-grown terrorism. Gary LaMaster joins co-hosts Mike Cosentino and Steve Williamson for a follow-up with Mr. Johnson on domestic right-wing extremism and the potential it represents for acts of violence against the government and civil society.

Posted in Department of Homeland Security, Domestic Extremism, Domestic Terrorism, Firearms and Explosives, Government, Gun Control, Homeland Security, Interviews, Law Enforcement, Military, National Politics, Podcasts | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Daryl Johnson Interview, Part 2 — Podcast December 24, 2012

Daryl Johnson Interview — Podcast December 17, 2012


Playing Politics with Homeland Security: How a Republican Attempt to Embarrass the Obama Administration Weakened Our Safeguards Against Domestic Terrorism. Daryl Johnson, a former senior analyst with the Department of Homeland Security, explains how a 2009 report that he and his team authored on the potential threat of right-wing extremist groups was misused by Republican conservatives in an attempt to discredit the incoming Obama Administration. Democratic Perspective co-hosts Mike Cosentino and Steve Williamson investigate yet another phony Republican scandal, this time with real negative consequences not only for Mr. Johnson personally, but also for our national security.

Posted in Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms and Explosives, Department of Homeland Security, Domestic Extremism, Domestic Terrorism, Government, Interviews, Law Enforcement, National Politics, Podcasts | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

The Fiscal Cliff: What’s At Stake — Podcast November 10, 2012


The Fiscal Cliff: Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security. Democratic Perspective co-hosts Mike Cosentino and Steve Williamson continue their discussion from last week on the fiscal cliff negotiations in Washington. What do the Republicans and Democrats want, and in particular, why are the Republicans in the House so eager to hold Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security hostage to their extreme ideological agenda.

Posted in Affordable Care Act, Budget Negotiations, Deficit Reduction, Economic Policy, Entitlements, Fiscal Policy, Government, Medicaid, Medicare, National Politics, Podcasts, Taxes and the Deficit, U.S. Budget | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on The Fiscal Cliff: What’s At Stake — Podcast November 10, 2012

The Real Victims Of The Fiscal Cliff.

Since Tea Party Republicans led our nation to a fiscal cliff in 2011 by refusing to raise the debt ceiling without lowering the deficit, our economy has been held hostage. Unable to agree on budget negotiations, Congress instituted sequestration cuts intended to be so onerous that neither side would want them to take effect.

More than a year later, negotiations still have not been completed. As a result, come January 1, we will see massive cuts to the defense budget as well as social programs, including the so-called “entitlements” unless the two parties can reach agreement on alternatives.

If the cuts take effect, those who created our deficits will not be the ones to suffer the brunt of the cuts. Rather, almost all of the burden will be borne by the poor and the middle class.

The first ones to experience the pain will be the 2.1 million unemployed who will lose unemployment benefits at the end of this year. In addition, there will be cuts to Social Security and Medicare which will punish the elderly. Numerous other social safety nets will also see cuts affecting millions more of the working poor. And the proposed cuts to defense will be borne by middle class workers who will likely lose their jobs.

Moreover, the fiscal cliff will almost certainly send our economy spiraling downward into a deep recession which will have serious consequences for everyone except the very wealthy.

One need only to look at Greece, Italy, England and others to see the consequences of austerity programs such as that advocated by Tea Party Republicans. The results have included deep recessions, riots and political upheaval.

It would be the height of foolishness for Congress to follow these countries over the cliff. Certainly, our budget deficits and federal debt are of long-term concern. But they do not constitute a crisis. As the economy has improved, the Obama administration has already begun to cut the deficit. That should continue. But it is economic suicide to make massive cuts in a weak economy. Instead, our government should be focused on strengthening the economy and creating jobs. Once the economy is on solid footing, both revenue and cuts should accelerate.

That is the recommendation of most economists. Unfortunately, the GOP seems unwilling to accept the advice.

For example, the GOP proposal recommends that eligibility for Medicare be increased to age 67. According to a Kaiser Foundation study, this will save approximately $5.7 billion per year. Unfortunately, the same study estimates that it will also result in $8.2 billion per year in increased costs. Why? Because seniors without health insurance tend to put off surgeries and other medical care until they are eligible for Medicare. The longer they put off treatment, the more expensive the treatment becomes.

At very best, raising the age for eligibility will simply transfer the costs from the government to those who can least afford it. And the Kaiser Foundation study concludes that increasing the age of eligibility will have no affect on the sustainability of Medicare. The only way to fix Medicare is to contain the costs of our out-of-control healthcare system which ranks as the most expensive in the world. The Affordable Care Act is a good start toward that goal.

As for Social Security, it has not contributed one dollar to the deficit or debt. In fact, Congress has repeatedly borrowed money from the trust fund in order to pay for other things.

The reality of the fiscal cliff is that it is entirely manufactured by the Tea Party, Karl Rove and Fox News Channel, along with their wealthy sponsors such as the Koch Brothers, Sheldon Adelson, Peter G. Peterson and corporate-led front groups who are determined to privatize federal programs such as Social Security in order to further line their pockets.

Posted in Affordable Care Act, Budget Negotiations, Deficit Reduction, Economic Policy, Entitlements, Financial Crisis, Fiscal Policy, Government, Health Care, Medicare, Military, National Debt Ceiling, National Politics, Privatization, Social Security, U.S. Budget, Unemployment | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on The Real Victims Of The Fiscal Cliff.

The Fiscal Cliff: What It Is and Isn’t — Podcast December 3, 2012


The Fiscal Cliff: Tax Rates, Entitlements, and the Republican Clown Show. Democratic Perspective co-hosts Mike Cosentino and Steve Williamson dissect the so-called fiscal cliff. What it is, where it got its name, and what happens if or when we go over it. As with all negotiations between Democrats and Republicans these days, the negotiations concerned with future tax revenues and expenditures are based at least in part on false premises, and as a consequence, have been predictably bitter, protracted, and crippled by an ideological catechism that — on the Republican side at least — seems to have been written for an economic universe ruled by pure fantasy. As some cynic once said, it’s hard to know whether we’re being ruled by smart people who are putting us on, or by imbeciles who really mean it.

Posted in Arizona Budget, Budget Negotiations, Deficit Reduction, Economic Policy, Entitlements, Fiscal Policy, Government, Medicare, Monetary Policy, National Debt Ceiling, National Politics, Podcasts, Social Security | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on The Fiscal Cliff: What It Is and Isn’t — Podcast December 3, 2012

Desperately Seeking Scandal — Podcast November 26, 2012


Desperately Seeking Scandal: Democratic Perspective co-hosts Mike Cosentino and Steve Williamson discuss the Republican Party’s use of scandal-mongering as a political tool. It doesn’t bother adherents of the Republican right wing if they can’t find a real scandal in Washington, the machinery is already in place to invent one whenever they think they need one. Fox News doesn’t care that voter fraud doesn’t really exist, that the Solyndra business plan made sense in the solar panel market as it was when they received a federal loan, or that Susan Rice’s early comments on the murder of four Americans in Benghazi accurately reflected what was known at the time she made them. They’re not in the truth business, they’re in the obstruction business.

Posted in Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms and Explosives, Foreign Affairs, Government, Media Campaigns, Middle East, National Politics, Podcasts, Scandal Mongering | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Desperately Seeking Scandal — Podcast November 26, 2012

Assessing the Robin Hood Tax — Podcast November 19, 2012


Assessing the Robin Hood Tax: Democratic Perspective co-hosts Mike Cosentino and Steve Williamson look at the proposed Financial Transaction Tax, otherwise known as the Robin Hood Tax, that would levy a 0.5% tax on financial trading transactions. How much revenue would it generate, what effect would it have on the securities and bond markets, and how could it be instituted in such a way as to prevent securities traders from moving offshore?

Posted in Deficit Reduction, Economic Policy, Financial Sector, Fiscal Policy, Investment Banking, Monetary Policy, National Politics, Podcasts, Tax and Investment Policy, Taxes and the Deficit, U.S. Budget | Tagged | Comments Off on Assessing the Robin Hood Tax — Podcast November 19, 2012

Assessing The Robin Hood Tax.

With the so-called “Fiscal Cliff” looming, Democratic Perspective hosts, Mike Cosentino and Steve Williamson, examined one of the most promising options for raising revenue – the Financial Transaction Tax (AKA The Robin Hood Tax).

The tax is supported by a thousand economists along with Warren Buffet and Bill Gates. Additionally, the tax already exists in 28 countries. The latest to begin implement ing the tax is France. Even the Vatican supports the idea.

The .5 percent tax would not affect normal bank activities, so it would have little effect on ordinary people. Mostly, it will impact high-speed trading – the trades made by computers to take advantage of minor fluctuations in share prices. Not traditional “buy and hold” investments.

Previously, the tax was proposed in the US House of Representatives by Rep. Chaka Fattah of Pennsylvania but never got out of committee. A similar bill was also proposed in the Senate by Senator Tom Harkin of Iowa. Again, it never got out of committee. But similar bills have surfaced again in both houses of Congress.

Details are yet to be worked out, but the Center for Economic and Policy Research estimates that a financial transaction tax could generate $177 billion per year. Other estimates say it would raise about 20 times the amount of revenue that would be collected from the so-called Buffet Rule which would allow the Bush tax cuts expire for those with adjusted incomes of $250,000 or more.

Even though, there has been little political will to institute the transaction tax as yet, the idea is gaining steam. The biggest obstacle is that it opponents feel that it must be global – that all of the world’s advanced economies would have to adopt the tax. Otherwise, they fear, investors would just move their investments to countries without the tax.

But since nations such as Argentina, Austria, Brazil, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Portugal, South Africa, Slovenia, Spain and Venezuela support the tax, it would seem that it is close to becoming a reality.

Posted in Deficit Reduction, Economic Policy, Financial Sector, Fiscal Policy, Investment Banking, Monetary Policy, National Politics, Tax and Investment Policy, Taxes and the Deficit, U.S. Budget | Tagged | Comments Off on Assessing The Robin Hood Tax.