Sequestration Explained.

March 4, 2013, Democratic Perspective tried to cut through all the hyperbole, misinformation and lies about sequestration. Sequestration represents mandatory spending cuts which were agreed to by Congress and President Obama ass the result of the debt ceiling debate in 2011. These are across-the-board cuts in discretionary spending that were intended to be so painful that legislators would be forced to negotiate more agreeable ways to reduce the federal deficit.

They didn’t.

After reluctantly agreeing to raise income taxes on those making more than $400,000, Republicans refused to discuss further revenue options of any kind, and insisted on deficit reduction consisting of deep cuts to social programs and so-called entitlements such as Medicaid, Medicare and Social Security.

When the president refused to agree to the cuts, he was forced to sign sequestration into law.

Although the cuts may not immediately be felt, if allowed to stand, they will be painful for almost everyone. For example, sequestration cuts $928 million for disaster relief aid, $289 million for the Center for Disease Control, and $175 million for energy assistance for the poor.

Sequestration cuts also include a 9 percent cut from unemployment checks and a cut of 2 percent from payments to Medicare providers. It will cut reimbursements to hospitals for unpaid medical care, cut mental assistance for up to 373,000 people, cut Head Start for 70,000 kids, and cut rental assistance for as many as 125,000 low-income families.

The cuts will force furloughs for FDA food inspectors, TSA agents, FAA controllers, and Border Patrol. And, of course, there will be large cuts to non-essential defense programs forcing layoffs and furloughs to civilian defense contractors.

In total, the cuts are expected to cost the nation as many as 750,000 jobs at a time when our economy is experiencing a fragile recovery. You can see how the cuts will affect your state on the linked interactive map.

None of this pain is necessary. This is a self-inflicted crisis. Congress created it and it can end it. All that’s needed is common sense compromise.

The direction of our economy was the central issue for last fall’s presidential election. President Obama ran for re-election on a balanced approach to deficit reduction. But it seems that Republicans didn’t get the message. Even though polls show that the majority of Americans agree with the president, Republican leaders have refused to negotiate in good faith. They claim the president has never offered a plan that includes spending cuts, yet there it is for all to see at WhiteHouse.gov.

The president’s plan calls for $2.50 in spending cuts for every $1.00 of new revenue, resulting in total deficit reduction of more than $4.3 trillion. The only new revenue comes from closing a variety of tax loopholes and limiting tax deductions to 28% for the wealthiest Americans.

This certainly would not seem unreasonable, especially since effective tax rates for wealthy Americans are near historic lows while their incomes are at historic highs.

Posted in Deficit Reduction, Economic Policy, Entitlements, Government, Jobs and Employment, Medicaid, Medicare, National Debt Ceiling, National Politics, Social Security, Taxes and the Deficit, U.S. Budget | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Sequestration Explained.

Budget Sequestration and Our Dysfunctional Congress — Podcast March 4, 2013


How Dumb Can Congress Get? The Dismal Facts About Budget Sequestration:  Gary LaMaster joins Democratic Perspective co-hosts Mike Cosentino and Steve Williamson to discuss the current federal budget sequester. What it is, why and how it happened, and its effects, none of them good, on the U.S. economy and the well-being of American citizens.

Posted in Arizona Budget, Budget Negotiations, Deficit Reduction, Economic Policy, Entitlements, Fiscal Policy, Government, Health Care, Jobs and Employment, Medicaid, Medicare, National Debt Ceiling, National Politics, Podcasts, Tax and Investment Policy, Taxes and the Deficit, U.S. Budget | Tagged , | Comments Off on Budget Sequestration and Our Dysfunctional Congress — Podcast March 4, 2013

Politics and the Supreme Court — Podcast February 25, 2012


Politics and the Supreme Court: How Constitutional Interpretation is Influenced by Political Realities.  Gary LaMaster joins Democratic Perspective co-hosts Mike Cosentino and Steve Williamson to look at how some upcoming Supreme Court cases reflect the collision between a conservative majority on the Court and the changing national political climate.

Posted in Constitutional Issues, Legal Issues, National Politics, Podcasts, Supreme Court | Tagged , | Comments Off on Politics and the Supreme Court — Podcast February 25, 2012

Supreme Conservatives.

On February 25, 2013, Democratic Perspective discussed the conservative lean of the Supreme Court of the United States and a few of the cases that will be heard this year by the Court.

First, we explained a few facts about the Court itself. The Court was established by the Constiturion. The document calls for each Justice to be appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate. That’s it. There’s nothing more. The Constitution provides no guidelines. It doesn’t list qualifications. It doesn’t even dictate the number of Justices (there are now nine).

Each year, the Court receives approximately 8,000 petitions (cases). If one of the justices selects a case, it’s discussed by the entire body of the Court and if four justices agree, it is placed on the docket.

There are four criteria which make can cause a case to be heard. 1 – Does the case raise a substantial federal question? 2 – Does the case represent a disagreement between Circuit Courts or between states? 3 – Has the case been brought forward by the US Solicitor General? 4 – Does the case transcend individuals, i.e. will the case affect other constituencies?

Some of the more interesting cases for this session are:

McCutcheon v Federal Elections Commission challenges the cap on how much a donor can give to candidates and party committees over a two-year election cycle. The cap is currently $123,200. Shaun McCutcheon is joined in the lawsuit by Republican National Committee.

Shelby County, AL v Holder challenges the 1965 Voting Rights Act which was re-approved in 2009 and reequires pre-clearance for any changes in voting within a covered jurisdiction.

Fisher v University of Texas challenges Affirmative Action with regard to admittance to the university. The complaintant claims she was not admitted despite having a record superior to some minority students who were admitted.

United States v Windsor and Hollingsworth v Perry are two cases wich involve the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). The outcome of these cases will determine whether or not DOMA violates the 14th Amendment’s “equal protection” clause.

The last case featured is Maryland v King. The issue at stake centers on the right to privacy versus search and seizure. More specifically, can a criminal suspect be required to submit to providing a DNA sample? Also, can the state retain the DNA if the arrest doesn’t result in a conviction?

You can search individual cases at: http://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docket.aspx

Posted in National Politics | Tagged , | Comments Off on Supreme Conservatives.

Frank Camacho Interview — Podcast February 18, 2013


Arizona’s State Legislature: “The Meth Lab of Democracy.”  In a wide-ranging interview with Democratic Perspective, Frank Camacho, Communications Director of the Arizona Democratic Party, talks about partisan maneuvering in the Arizona State Legislature, where the Republican majority is currently blocking hearings on Democratic Party-sponsored bills on gun safety, and evaluates the prospects for the upcoming Medicaid expansion bill proposed by Governor Brewer. Among other issues, he also discusses potential candidates for the upcoming state-wide elections, the possibility that Governor Brewer might run for a third term, and what it will take to re-create a Democratic Party majority in Arizona for the first time in decades.

Posted in Affordable Care Act, Arizona Politics, Interviews, Medicaid, Podcasts | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Frank Camacho Interview — Podcast February 18, 2013

“The Meth Lab Of Democracy.”

On February 18, 2013, Democratic Perspective hosted Frank Camacho, Communications Director of the Arizona Democratic Party. With tongue firmly planted in cheek, the former news anchor and political reporter, jokingly refers to the Arizona State Legislature as “the meth lab of democracy.”

In recent years, the legislature has lived up to that name.

We began our interview by asking Camacho about Democratic-sponsored bills on gun safety which have been denied a hearing by the Republican majority leader. “Both are common sense approaches,” said Camacho. “One would close the gun show loophole for background checks. The second would revive the program of school resource officers which was cut a few years ago.”

According to Camacho, Majority Leader Andy Tobin is upset because the bills’ Democratic sponsor, Chad Campbell, didn’t call him to tell him these bills were coming. “It’s childish when you consider what’s at stake,” Camacho said.

Another of the important issues facing the legislature is the expansion of Medicaid as part of the Affordable Care Act proposed by Governor Brewer. “It caught everyone by surprise,” said Camacho. “The expansion would result in a 10 to 1 return on Arizona taxes. 50,000 Arizonans would get health insurance and it would help save regional hospitals because 1 in 5 Arizonans lack insurance,” he continued. “It’s the bill that most affects Arizona’s economy and future.”

During the wide-ranging interview, we covered numerous other topics, including potential candidates for the 2014 state-wide elections, the possibility that Brewer could run for a third term and the prospects of Arizona turning blue. “Arizona is going to turn blue, sooner or later,” said Camacho, “but we have to provide people reasons to be Democrats. On the other hand, Republicans are giving people lots of reasons not to be Republicans.”
“We need to figure out why people are not yet Democrats. We have to let them know that Democrats are offering common sense solutions,” he stated.

Posted in Affordable Care Act, Arizona Politics, Interviews | Tagged , | Comments Off on “The Meth Lab Of Democracy.”

The Destructive Nature of Republican Lies.

On February 11, 2013, Democratic Perspective addressed some of the most insidious lies told by Republicans and their Tea Party allies, and the long-term effect of those lies. We began by revisiting the birthers.

As you may remember, the issue of President Obama’s citizenship arose during the 2008 Democratic primary. It was allegedly started by someone in the Hillary Clinton campaign as her chances began to fade. Of course, the Obama campaign immediately addressed the attack by posting a copy of his birth certificate on the Internet. The copy was supplied by the State of Hawaii.

Shortly afterward, the Obama campaign posted newspaper clippings of Obama’s birth announcement taken from two Honolulu newspapers. The issue seemed settled…until the McCain campaign raised the issue again in the general election.

Since that time, Republicans, particularly Tea Party Republicans, have not let it die. There have been lawsuits asking for the 2008 election results to be overturned. Led by people like Orly “Birther” Taitz, Rep. Michele Bachmann, Sarah Palin, Donald Trump and Sheriff Joe Arpaio, conservatives have used the “controversy” to claim that President Obama’s presidency is illegitimate. Therefore, they surmise, they do not have to accept any of Obama’s policies.

Apparently, some actually believe that Obama was born in Kenya and that, through some decades-long conspiracy, he was able to falsify his birth certificate, plant birth announcements in the newspapers, and force Hawaiian officials to lie on his behalf…all so he could force his Kenyan socialist agenda on the US. You’ll find these theories and more on a myriad of blogs and websites and you’ve heard them repeated ad nauseum on right wing radio and TV.

So what is the impact of all this?

As mentioned, the lie has given conservatives a reason to vilify the president, even before he entered office. It has given them reason to suspect that he has a hidden anti-American agenda. During his first weeks in office, it led them to protest a speech intended for school children as “indoctrination” (something previous presidents have done without controversy).

The lie has caused conservatives to suspect sinister motives behind every initiative and every attempt to right the economy following one of the worst economic collapses in history. And it has caused them to heap blame on President Obama for problems caused by the previous administration.

Of course, this is all the result of just one lie. There have been hundreds more. And each of them has had a similar effect.

Posted in Blogging, Conspiracy Theories, Mass Media, National Politics, Political Lies, Scandal Mongering | Tagged , | Comments Off on The Destructive Nature of Republican Lies.

Turning America Blue.

For the February 4 edition of Democratic Perspective, Mike Cosentino and Bill Timberman looked into their crystal balls to determine our political future.

Much has been written about Republican strategist Karl Rove’s 2004 prediction of a permanent Republican majority. Obviously, based on the 2008 Democratic landslide and the overwhelming re-election of President Obama in 2012, that prediction did not come true. So what are we to make of similar predictions following the 2012 election outcomes that now preduct a future Democratic majority?

Obviously, the political landscape can change quicklly, so we should take any predictions with a large grain of salt. But it appears that, this time, demographics are in the Democrats’ favor. The Hispanic and Latino populations are increasing dramatically. There are increasing numbers of college graduates and unmarried, working, and highly-educated women. Democrats have also solidified votes from the LGBT community by supporting gay marriage. Moreover, the millennial generation (those born between 1978 and 2000) is adding 4 million voters every year. All of these factions tend to support progressive issues.

And, when you look at the accomplishments of the Democratic Party – Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, civil rights, the Affordable Care Act and immigration reform – it’s difficult to imagine the majority of voters not supporting Democratic candidates.

Meanwhile, as minorities gain in numbers, the white population and those who describe themselves as practicing Christians (the Republicans’ most reliable voting blocs) are decreasing.

The demographic realities show the extent of the problem facing conservatives. Is it any wonder, then, that we’re witnessing an ideological battle between traditiional Republicans and the more exteme Tea Party faction?

However, not everything is coming up roses for Democrats.

The GOP now controls the legislatures in 30 states which allow it to control the gerrymandering of voting districts. Indeed, as Bill pointed out, Republicans have raised gerrymandering to a fine art. This makes GOP control of the US House of Representatives secure for the foreseeable future.

For more detailed information, read Ruy Teixeira’s report for the Center for American Progress Action Fund or any of the articles listed below:

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/11/the-emerging-democratic-majority-turns-10/265005/

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2012/11/has-the-emerging-democratic-majority-emerged.html

http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/11/forget-nate-silver-meet-the-guy-who-called-2012-in-2002.php

http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/skeptical-emerging-democratic-majority_662162.html

http://www.cato.org/blog/emerging-democratic-majority

http://www.newrepublic.com/blog/jonathan-chait/86116/the-emerging-democratic-majority-emerges

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/11/25/democrats-see-a-future-of-electoral-dominance-but-history-says-otherwise.html

Posted in Affordable Care Act, Democratic Governance, Elections, Government, Medicaid, Medicare, National Politics, Social Security, Women's Rights | Tagged | Comments Off on Turning America Blue.

Lies, Distortions, and Conspiracy Theories: the Impact on Politics and Civil Society — Podcast February 11, 2013


Lies, Distortions, and Conspiracy Theories: What They Really Cost Us. Gary LaMaster joins Democratic Perspective co-hosts Mike Cosentino and Steve Williamson to analyze the systematic lying that undermines democratic decision-making, open public policy debates, and the trust which is fundamental to a healthy civil society.

Posted in Conspiracy Theories, Democratic Governance, Elections, Government, Mass Media, Podcasts, Political Lies | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Lies, Distortions, and Conspiracy Theories: the Impact on Politics and Civil Society — Podcast February 11, 2013

Who Owns Our Political Future? — Podcast February 4, 2013


Who Owns Our Political Future? What the Demographic Trends Tell Us: We’ve heard a lot in recent years about John B. Judis and Ruy Teixera’s 2002 book, The Emerging Democratic Majority, and Karl Rove’s 2003 claim to have created a Permanent Republican Majority, but even after Obama’s re-election, it still seems to a lot of us that what we’ve got is gridlock: gridlock in Washington, and gridlock in the American electorate. What is the evidence that this gridlock is about to be broken by either party? Democratic Perspective investigates.

Posted in Arizona Politics, Government, National Politics, Podcasts | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Who Owns Our Political Future? — Podcast February 4, 2013