A Very Clear Choice.

This week, former Congresswoman, Ann Kirkpatrick was a guest on Democratic Perspective.

When asked about losing her Congressional seat in 2010, Kirkpatrick replied, “It’s not the first time I’ve been bucked off a horse. I just have to pick myself up and get back on.”

As to why she has decided to run for office again, she said, “The defining moment for me was when he (Paul Gosar) voted for the Ryan budget plan that would end Medicare. The reason we have Medicare is to prevent insurance companies from denying coverage for pre-existing conditions. For Republicans, saving Medicare means vouchers and saving the environment means uranium mining in the Grand Canyon. Gosar has supported uranium mining in the Grand Canyon.”

“The government needs to help us protect our natural resources,” she continued. “That’s why I support the National Scenic Area designation for Sedona and why I want to protect the Grand Canyon. In fact, the NSA designation for Sedona is the first bill I will introduce after my election.

In addressing the current economic problems, Kirkpatrick said, “It’s the American people who are going to turn the economy around. I hear great ideas from people every day. I’d like to see a diversified, sustainable economy in Arizona. That includes tourism to take advantage of our wonderful natural resources, bio-medicine, alternative energy such as wind and solar, and education. We need good teachers to help educated children for good, middle class jobs that can support a family.”

“That’s who we are as Americans. That’s what I stand for.”
“The gap between the extremely wealthy and the middle class has never been greater. I talk to people all the time. They’re struggling. Recently at a food kitchen in Flagstaff, I was seeing working families. They can’t find good jobs. But they’re working part timeand need help. The shelter is at capacity.”

When asked about her independent streak when it came to votes on legislation, Kirkpatrick didn’t shy away from her record. “I’ve always taken an independent path,” she said. “I was born and raised in this Congressional District. I never expected to run for Congress. When I was first approached to run in 2004, I asked my law partners about it. They encouraged me to run. They said I probably wouldn’t be elected, but it would be good for business.”

“This is a very unique area that I was proud to represent,” she stated. “The Congressional District has the largest native American population of any in the nation.”

When asked what’s different about this campaign from the one in which she was defeated in 2010, Kirkpatrick responded, “There’s a very clear choice. Now people know more about Paul Gosar. They know what he really stands for. We have very different views on policies. This time, I have a very strong grassroots campaign. It’s very different this time.”

Posted in Arizona Politics, Economic Policy, Elections, Government, Interviews, Medicare, National Politics | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on A Very Clear Choice.

Alan Grayson Interview — Podcast September 26, 2011


Do the Republicans Actually Care About What Happens To Most of Us, Or Are They Just Political Attack Dogs? Alan Grayson, former Democratic Congressional Representative from Florida’s 8th District, tells Democratic Perspective why the Republicans are still wrong about health care, the economy, and unemployment, and why he’s running again in 2012.

Posted in Affordable Care Act, American Jobs Act, Elections, Fiscal Policy, Government, Health Care, Interviews, Monetary Policy, National Politics, Podcasts, Taxes and the Deficit, U.S. Budget, Unemployment | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Alan Grayson Interview — Podcast September 26, 2011

“Republicans are sadistic. They take pleasure in others’ pain.”

That’s how Alan Grayson described the Republican stance against health care reform in an interview with Democratic Perspective. Grayson, you may remember is the outspoken former Florida Congressman who famously described the GOP health plan as: 1 – Don’t get sick. 2 – If you get sick, die quickly. Says Grayson, “I have been proven right, but I wish I was wrong.”

Grayson graduated with honors from Harvard in law and public policy. Prior to being elected to Congress, he was the first to sue contractors in Iraq for overcharging the US.

“The US is the only industrialized country without universal health care,” he said.

When the Democratic led Congress tried to reform health insurance, the Republicans fought every step. “Month after month, we heard nothing but potshots against our plan,” Grayson declared. “After President Obama made a speech about health care reform, Republicans waved their plan in the air on the House floor. After they were done, they left the papers. When I picked them up, I discovered they were blank pieces of paper. That’s what led to me describe their plan the way I did.”

“44,000 Americans die every year because they don’t have health care insurance,” he continued. “If you have two people of the same age and condition, the one without insurance is 40 percent more likely to die than the one with insurance. Five times more people die each year than all the soldiers killed in Iraq over 8 years.”

When asked about legal challenges to the Affordable Care Act, Grayson said he’s unsure. “I don’t know what will happen when the health care bill comes before the US Supreme Court. It’s occupied territory these days.”

But Grayson knows that our present insurance-based system needs to change. “Insurance companies take as much money from you as possible and pay as little for your care as possible. The rest is profit.”

“Because of the Affordable Care Act, insurance companies can no longer turn down customers for pre-existing conditions,” he continued. “And young people can be covered under their parents’ insurance until they’re 26. That’s huge because it’s very hard for young people to get coverage. Often, they can’t afford it. And most don’t receive health insurance from their employers.”

As for the future, Grayson says, “I’m really concerned about the next generation. I fear it’s a lost generation drowning in Republican propaganda.”

That’s why Grayson is running for Congress again. If you’re interested in supporting him, his website is www.CongressmanWithGuts.com.

He says his reasons are simple. “I want to see our basic problems solved,” he says. “23 million Americans can’t find jobs. 40 million depend on the government for food through food stamps. And 55 million can’t get health insurance.”

Posted in Affordable Care Act, Government, Interviews, National Politics | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on “Republicans are sadistic. They take pleasure in others’ pain.”

The Jobs Crisis. How We Got Here.

This week, Verde Valley Independent Democrat board member, Bill Timberman joined host Steve Williamson on Democratic Perspective to discuss the overriding issue in today’s economy.

Bill began by looking back about 60 years to the end of WWII. “The image of American prosperity came from the period of about 1950-1972,” he said. “People made good money making war materials during the war, but there was nothing to buy. Things were rationed so they had a lot of savings. After the war, they needed to replace stuff that had worn out. So there was a huge boom.”

“Beginning about 1970, two things happened to our economy,” Bill said. “The first is what I like to call ‘We aren’t making things anymore’. The second is what I call the ‘Wall Street casino’,” he said.

He explained the first this way, “After the war, industry in Japan and Germany became competitive and reasonably priced. Think Volkswagen and Toyota. To compete, American businesses tried to reduce costs. So manufacturers started to run away from Michigan to Tennessee to Brazil and to China where they could produce products at much lower costs. But the wages were paid in other countries. So over time, you had a hollowing out of demand.”

“To maintain their middle class living, both parents had to go to work. After that, they had to start borrowing. As a result, up until the 90s, the middle class lifestyle was based on credit. Not on wages. And because everything is connected to everything else, the effects reverberated throughout the economy,” he said.

“This is where the Wall Street casino comes in,” Timberman continued. “The service industry was supposed to replace manufacturing. But most service jobs pay far less, except at the very top. As a result, we saw a huge increase in lawyers, financial advisers, Wall Street traders, and so on. The people with a lot of money realized they didn’t have to build a plant and hire a lot of people to make a profit. They could simply trade paper around on Wall Street.”

“Up to 1985,” he continued, “The financial sector represented 15 percent of corporate profits. Now it’s 41 percent. The same amount of profit now goes to a smaller number of people. You had thousands on an assembly line at a GM plant. But it takes many fewer people to trade stocks. Companies still make great profits, but for a smaller sector of the economy. About the only manufacturing left is the defense industry because they don’t sell to consumers. As a result, the dollars aren’t spread around as much.”

“As manufacturing jobs disappear, the consumer economy also shrinks,” he said. “It has to be propped up by debt. For example, people buy cars with loans on their home equity. That’s fine while house prices are going up. But what happens when they don’t?”

“People have to be able to buy things,” he continued. “Even though goods are cheaper, wages are lower. The trade off for exporting manufacturing is cheaper goods. But fewer can afford them. We can get into a downward spiral rather easily. Lower wages results in lower consumer sales which results in lower revenues for governments which results in fewer public workers, such as teachers and firefighters.”

“The cumulative effect is that people stop investing,” he pointed out. “That’s why businesses are sitting on cash. Apple now has more cash reserves than the US government. Why are they sitting on it? They don’t think enough consumers can buy their products.”

“The only way out is jobs,” Bill said. “We have to look at tax structures and public investment.”

Posted in American Jobs Act, Economic Policy, Fiscal Policy, Government, Monetary Policy, National Politics, U.S. Budget, Unemployment | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

Jobs, Jobs, Jobs — Podcast September 19, 2011


14 Million Unemployed: How We Got Here, and What the President Is Trying To Do About It. Democratic Perspective recounts the history of the current unemployment crisis in the U.S., and discusses how passage of the American Jobs Act can help put people back to work.

Posted in American Jobs Act, Economic Policy, Podcasts, Unemployment | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Jobs, Jobs, Jobs — Podcast September 19, 2011

Upcoming Broadcasts — September and October, 2011

Here is the schedule of upcoming Democratic Perspective broadcasts for September and October, 2011:

September 19: Jobs, Income and the Future: Why unemployment is so high, wages are so low, and what we can do about it. Democratic Perspective tackles the stagnant U.S. economy — how it got in such bad shape, what the future looks like for ordinary wage-earners, and what we can do to restore prosperity for everybody.

September 26: Alan Grayson Interview.
Alan Grayson, former Democratic Congressional Representative from Florida’s 8th District, famous for his no-holds-barred style, and for going after Republicans on their own turf, explains why he’s running again in 2012, and why the need to do something different about the country’s problems is more pressing now than it ever has been.

October 3: Ann Kirkpatrick, interview — LIVE in our KAZM studio.
Democratic Perspective talks to Ann Kirkpatrick about state and national issues, and how they affect us here in Northern Arizona. We’ll ask her about her positions, and the progress on her current campaign for Congress.

October 10: Ann Kirkpatrick Interview, Part 2.

October 17: Raúl Grijalva Interview. Raúl M. Grijalva, Democratic Congressional Representative from Arizona’s 7th District, and co-chair of the U.S. House Progressive Caucus, talks with Democratic Perspective about the issues facing Arizona and the Nation, and discusses the The Prioritize Emergency Job Creation Act to Allow for Emergency Job Creation Funding, which Representatives Grijalva, Barbara Lee and John Conyers introduced in the House on September 13.

October 24: Raúl Grijalva Interview, Part 2.

Join us on am780 KAZM for a fresh look at the issues of the day from a reality-based Democratic Perspective.

Posted in Broadcast Schedule | Comments Off on Upcoming Broadcasts — September and October, 2011

Barbara Litrell Interview — Podcast September 12, 2011


Democratic Perspective Goes Local: Barbara Litrell Discusses the Proposed State Route 89A Takeover in Sedona. Democratic Perspective interviews Sedona City Council member Barbara Litrell on the latest developments in the State Route 89A takeover controversy — the issue, the politics, and the upcoming vote on Propositions 410 and 411 in the special election being held this November 8th.

Posted in Arizona Politics, Elections, Government, Interviews, Podcasts | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Barbara Litrell Interview — Podcast September 12, 2011

Responding To Misguided Referendums And Rumors.

Sedona City Council member, Barbara Litrell, was recently invited to appear on Democratic Perspective to discuss a local issue of roadway control in Sedona.

According to Litrell, since 2006 the Sedona City Council has asked ADOT (Arizona Dept. of Transportation) to improve safety in West Sedona. “ADOT’s solution is to install 108 street lights on a 2.3-mile section of Highway 89A,” she said. “When Sedona responded that most accidents occur during the day, ADOT offered a package of more than $15 million in funds and improvements for the city to assume control of the roadway, instead.”

“Following a City Council vote to accept control of the roadway,” said Litrell, “A small group of citizens opposed the decision and began a referendum. As a result, there will be a special election on Proposition 410 on November 8. A Yes vote on Prop 410 is a vote to approve the city’s takeover of the roadway. A No vote means that ADOT will continue to control the roadway and will install 108 lights from the intersection at Airport Road to the intersection at Dry Creek Road.”

Another proposition on the November 8 ballot is Prop 411. “A Yes vote on this proposition will mean that no city council in the future can negotiate with ADOT,” said Litrell. “I believe that Prop 411 is blatantly unconstitutional. There are rumors that taking over the roadway will cost the City of Sedona mega dollars resulting in the reduction of other city services,” she continued. “Those rumors are simply not true. There is also a fear that the roadway takeover will lead to a city property tax. Again, I do not believe that will happen,” she said. “The City Council could not make that decision. According to state law, voters would have to pass a bill requesting a property tax,” said Litrell.

“The City of Sedona has money available to improve and maintain the roadway,” Litrell said. “In addition to the money offered by ADOT, the city will have a $1.5 million surplus this year. There are additional funds now that the city has paid off the treatment plant. And, in any event, there is no plan to do all of the improvements at once,” she concluded.

Mail-in ballots for the election will be mailed on September 27 and must be returned by November 8. Or, if they prefer, voters can vote at their regular polling stations on Tuesday, Novermber 8. If Sedona residents vote Yes on Prop 410, Litrell said the city and ADOT will return to negotiations. “ADOT wants Sedona to take back the roadway,” Litrell stated.

More information on the subject is available at http://voiceofchoicefor89A.com.

Posted in Arizona Politics, Elections, Government, Interviews | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Responding To Misguided Referendums And Rumors.

Lane Kenworthy Interview, Part 2 — Podcast September 5, 2011


Trickle-Down Economics, Marginal Tax Rates, and the Rise in Income Inequality: Part 2 of Democratic Perspective’s interview with Professor Lane Kenworthy. What we really need to do if we want to successfully address the economic crisis brought about by the near-collapse of our banking system, and restore the American worker’s chance at a better life.

Posted in Fiscal Policy, Government, Interviews, Monetary Policy, National Politics, Podcasts, Taxes and the Deficit | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Lane Kenworthy Interview, Part 2 — Podcast September 5, 2011

Do Trickle-Down Economics Work?

As Democratic Perspective continued our conversation with Lane Kenworthy, Professor of Sociology and Political Science at the University of Arizona on Labor Day, we began by posing that question to him. Professor Kenworthy responded by saying, “To an extent. Nobody favors a perfectly equal distribution of income, but if you have a society like ours where a very small slice has been getting a whole lot of the economic growth, is it good for the middle class? Or is it bad? The best we can tell is that it’s not a healthy development.”

When asked how to address the growing income inequality, Kenworthy replied, “Some people favor pay limits on CEOs, but I don’t. For one thing, how do you then address the huge salaries for athletes and entertainers? It’s much simpler to raise taxes. There’s no indication that increasing the tax rate on the rich would create any harm.”

As to concerns that raising taxes on the wealthy will curtail job growth, Kenworthy said, “There’s nothing to indicate that it would. In fact, if the rich have to pay more of their income to taxes, it may cause them to work harder and actually create more jobs.”

As for the popular idea that running the federal government should be like managing a family budget – it should live within its means – Kenworthy stated, “This analogy gets back to the public’s frustration with the economy. People are looking for someone, or something, to blame. But the analogy is wrong on two accounts. It’s simply not true that families live within our means. We tend to be net debtors. We take out mortgages for our houses and borrow to get past problems such as car repair, medical emergencies, etc.”

“The same is true for government,” he continued. “There are needs that require borrowing and it’s best to borrow in times like now when the interest rates are low. Also, it’s good to run a surplus in good times. Our government was running a surplus in the 90s, but they forgot that principle in the early 2000s when they passed the tax cuts.”

Finally, we asked Professor Kenworthy what one thing we could do to fix the economy. He began his answer by saying, “First you have to separate the short term needs from the long term. The priority is to get back to economic growth and to improve employment. Then, for the longer run, we need to look for new sources of investment and boost wages for low-end service jobs. This is important because these jobs are now such a large part of our economy, and probably will be for the foreseeable future.”

Posted in Government, National Debt Ceiling, National Politics, U.S. Budget | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Do Trickle-Down Economics Work?