Gary LaMaster Interview — Podcast April 30, 2012


Myths, Delusions and Lies: How Tea Party Ideologues Are Poisoning Our Politics.  Gary LaMaster, member of the Verde Valley Independent Democrats’ editorial board, former journalist and one-time owner of a successful advertising agency in Minneapolis-Saint Paul, gives Democratic Perspective listeners  a preview of his soon-to-be-published new book, The Teapublican Book of Lies. 50 things that the Tea Party and the current Republican Party say that just aren’t true — about taxes, Social Security, health care, the environment, and the evils of government regulation.

Posted in Arizona Budget, De-regulation, Education, Environment, Health Care, Interviews, Podcasts, Social Security, Taxes and the Deficit, U.S. Budget | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Gary LaMaster Interview — Podcast April 30, 2012

Randy Parraz Interview — Podcast April 23, 2012


You Can’t Win If You Don’t Fight: Ending Extremism in Arizona Politics.  Democratic Perspective interviews Randy Parraz, founder of Citizens for a Better Arizona and leader of the successful effort to topple State Senator Russell Pearce, the sponsor of SB 1070. Randy explains how he and his allies organize against entrenched and corrupt politicians, and why Joe Arpaio, Sheriff of Maricopa County, who likes throwing  his political opponents in jail for no reason, is next on their list.

Posted in Arizona Politics, Government, Interviews, Podcasts | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Randy Parraz Interview — Podcast April 23, 2012

An Antidote To Extremism In Arizona.

His name is Randy Parraz, founder of Citizens for a Better Arizona and the man who led the effort to topple the sponsor of SB 1070, State Senator Russell Pearce. He has been called everything from “the man who is out to destroy Russell Pearce and America” to “a true progressive hero.”

An energetic and dedicated organizer, he sat still just long enough for an interview on Democratic Perspective.

Parraz learned about organizing as a boy in Sacramento, California where his father was a deputy sheriff and founder of the Latino Peace Officers Association. Randy has a law degree from the University of California, Berkley and a Master’s degree from the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University. He spent many years as an organizer, and in 2010 he ran for the US Senate seat currently held by Sen. John McCain.

Parraz’s approach to politics may be best described by a story he told recently at a meeting of the Democrats of the Red Rocks in Sedona. He asked why a full-grown elephant could be tethered to a stake. “Certainly the elephant has the strength to pull up the stake,” he stated. “But it doesn’t even try. That’s because, when the elephant is small, it’s tethered to a large tree. No matter how long it tugs and pulls, it can’t move the tree. Eventually, it learns not to challenge any resistance. “Parraz drew a parallel with politics. “We’re conditioned to accept things the way they are. So we don’t fight back. That is the real lesson of the Pearce recall. In order to change things we have to fight. If we do, we can win.”

Randy said he first realized the recall effort was necessary when Russell Pearce was elected president of the AZ State Senate. “His election was rewarding the extremes – the politics of fear and division,” he said. “I was shocked by how far the extremism had gone. Pearce was ignoring Arizona’s problems to carry out his own agenda – attacks on education and teacher’s pensions, guns on college campuses, a birther bill, etc. He was only concerned about the Tea Party. That worked in the primary, but it doesn’t work in a general election.”

After starting the recall effort, Parraz said “People with money and influence wouldn’t touch us at first. You have to organize within people’s experiences. This was outside their experiences.”

“We began by targeting households of Democrats and Independents. But we found that 1,500 Republicans came to (our tables at) the library to sign our petitions. When I asked one Republican why he signed, he said, ‘Russell Pearce is too extreme for me.’ As a result, that became the slogan for our campaign.”

“I didn’t care who ran against Pearce,” Parraz asserted. “We simply created the conditions for a candidate to emerge. I knew it would take a Republican and probably a Mormon. Jerry Lewis stepped forward and won. He’s a decent human being. You can have a conversation with him.”

“Pearce was upset that everyone was allowed to vote. Not just the extreme primary voters,” said Parraz. “That’s because it’s easy to control the primaries. You don’t need many Tea Party people to win. The beauty of the recall was that the only way to win was to bring everyone together.”

“Pearce lost the recall election by 12 points because Democrats, Republicans and Independents came together,” Parraz declared.

When asked about reports that Pearce is trying to get back into office, Parraz said, “Russell Pearce has announced that he is running for office in a new district. Another moderate Mormon is running against him – part of the same group of leaders that helped elect Lewis.”

Meanwhile, Parraz and Citizens for a Better Arizona are focused on defeating Sheriff Joe Arpaio in this fall’s election.

“This is personal,” said Parraz. “The sheriff had me arrested in 2008 when I tried to speak at a Maricopa County Board of Supervisors meeting. I was forced to leave the meeting and as I waited outside, a group of deputies warned me for ‘being too close to the building.’ When I told them I was within my rights to be there, they arrested me, handcuffed me, put me in leg shackles and in solitary. They held me on one charge as long as they could. Then they filed a second charge so they could hold me longer. It was harassment.”

“While that was going on,” Parraz continued, “Someone mistook Chad Snow for me. So they arrested him while he was walking out of the meeting. Chad is an attorney so when they let him go, Chad came to my cell and said he wanted to represent me. It took us a long time to fight the charges. If it wasn’t for Chad, it would have cost me $20,000 in attorney fees even though I was innocent. As a result of the harrassment, Chad became president of my group.”

“There has been a triangle of corruption in the county – several members of the Board of Supervisors, former County Attorney Andrew Thomas and Sheriff Arpaio. They were focused on arresting busboys instead of criminals. But if no one says anything, you’re not going to stop. You think you’re untouchable.”

“I want to create an army of canvassers to defeat Arpaio,” said Parraz. “At noon on May 10, we’re going to meet at the County office on Jefferson Street in Phoenix as a Citizen’s Grand Jury.”

We asked about the impact of a possible indictment of the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office for racial profiling. Parraz responded, “That could make it worse for us because Arpaio loves to play the victim.”

Posted in Arizona Politics, Government, Interviews | Tagged , , | Comments Off on An Antidote To Extremism In Arizona.

What’s the Hullabaloo about?

In this case, the reference is to the very popular blog by Digby, aka Heather Parton. On April, 16, 2012, Democratic Perspective was pleased to host the author who has a following of more than 166,000 clicks a week.

When asked about the origins of her success, Heather responded that she created Hullabaloo at “a fertile time for writing on the Internet. It followed the 2000 election that had a dubious outcome and 9/11,” she said. “I had been writing on some very liberal blogs and was encouraged to start my own.”

Heather said she thinks her interest in politics began early. “I grew up in a very political family that was extremely conservative,” she stated. “Obviously, I went the other direction.”

Turning to current events, we asked if she feels there really is a War on Women. Parton responded, “Yes, but I don’t know how it came about. The term is pretty organic in origin. It comes from the wide range of activities to restrict women’s freedom.  I think it’s a designed plan. There are more than 1,000 bills in the works to deny abortion, contraception, even to repeal the Lily Ledbetter Act guaranteeing equal pay for women.”

In discussing Republican attempts to restrict contraception, Parton said, “It goes back to the Griswold v. Connecticut decision that the right calls the ‘original sin.’ The right is very strategic. They work in increments and play the long game.”

“In 2010, it began with the election of Tea Partiers. The first thing they did is to put forward social conservative bills to restrict the rights of women. It seems that extreme social conservatives rebranded themselves as the Tea Party,” she said. “Arizona has gone further than anyone else. They have labeled abortion illegal before conception!”

“The Tea Party is hypocritical,” said Parton. “They ran on anti-government economic issues then went after contraception and abortion. But I think they dramatically overstepped. Most people are saying ‘What are they doing with this contraception stuff?’”

“They rushed contraception out of the blue,” she continued. “They didn’t realize how it would play. But they’re willing to lose a lot before they win. It legitimizes the debate and keeps it on the table. Contraception makes the abortion debate a place where compromise might happen.”

This strategy works because, as Heather commented, “The Left is willing to compromise anything.” At the same time, “The right wing is at a peak of crazy and power,” said Parton.

“Handing the contraception issue to employers has strange tinges of slavery,” Parton alleged. “Women can’t have freedom without reproductive rights. We can’t have a first class economy. We couldn’t have careers. We couldn’t go to college.” She went on to say that restricting contraception it would affect the whole family. “With the way the world is, men can’t support a family on their own anymore.”

When asked about CNN contributor Hillary Rosen’s recent statement criticizing Ann Romney as “having never worked a day in her life,” Parton responded, “Her quote was taken out of context. It wasn’t a smart way to put things. It happens every time. Someone foolishly puts things and it’s turned against us.”

“Ann Romney is a political wife. She cannot relate to average American women,” said Parton. “If Mitt needs his wife to interpret (them) for him, he should not be President of the United States. If you’re a rich person and you’re talking about cutting capital gains, increasing inheritance and cutting corporate taxes, you can’t relate to most people. These are not things that will help most people.”

We ended by asking Parton about Romney’s off-the-record comments at a recent fundraiser, in which he was overheard saying “I’m going to say a lot of things that aren’t true. I’m going to eliminate (all of these departments, etc.).  But I can’t run on that.”
She simply responded, “It’s on my blog this morning.”

You can find her blog at http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/. Also, Heather Parton recommended reading “The Reactionary Mind” by Corey Robbins.

Posted in Arizona Politics, Elections, Government, Interviews, National Politics, Women's Rights | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on What’s the Hullabaloo about?

Digby Interview — Podcast April 16, 2012


The War on Women: What Are We Really Talking About?  Democratic Perspective is proud to bring our listeners a half hour with Digby, the creator of Hullabaloo, one of the earliest, best written, and most widely quoted progressive blogs on the Internet. One of our country’s most passionate defenders of women’s reproductive freedom, Digby explains to co-hosts Mike Cosentino and Steve Williamson why, in the modern world, a woman can’t hope to control her own destiny unless and until she has the legally protected right to make her own reproductive choices.

Posted in Health Care, Interviews, National Politics, Podcasts, Women's Rights | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Digby Interview — Podcast April 16, 2012

More Than Enough Craziness To Go Around.

To celebrate the first Anniversary of Democratic Perspective, all of our members gathered in the studio to share information about the craziest bills in the Arizona State legislature. With so many from which to choose, we could have filled a day long program. But since our program is a half hour, we had to limit our choices to the most bizarre.

Put on your tin foil hat and get ready for some eye-popping craziness.

The first example of extremism is SB 1083 which would create the Arizona Special Missions Unit, a volunteer militia to be directed by the legislature and the governor. After 5 whole days of training, they would be given the power to apprehend and arrest and to seize property. The bill would also grant immunity to Unit members while “on duty.” In truth, this is little more than an armed group of vigilantes. The bill provides a budget of $1.4 million. But the potential cost to the state’s image is many times more.

HB 2563 mandates that public schools offer courses on the influence of the Bible. As Bill Timberman points out, it would seem in direct conflict with the Constitution’s establishment clause guaranteeing separation of church and state. “Schools are now going to be required to show the importance of the Bible in the US,” said Bill. “But this is a very diverse country, so what about the Book of Mormon? And with all the people of Chinese descent, why not the Analects of Confucious?”

SB 1507 is a Tea Party authored bill which would shut down any government initiative to reduce pollution and improve energy efficiency in cities, counties and the state. “It’s a bill being pushed by Arizona “Tea Party” members,” says Mike Cosentino. The bill is based on a conspiracy theory about the 1992 United Nations Rio Declaration on Evironment and Development which House Minority Leader Chad Campbell calls “the most ludicrous bill I’ve ever seen in six years in the Legislature.” Campbell says, “With this legislation, you could pretty much shut down any form of government sustainability.”

The bill stems from the so-called Agenda 21 Conspiracy, a Tea Party theory that the Rio conference represents an attempted UN takeover of our country.

Yet another anti-federal government bill would give Arizona the power to seize 25 million acres of federal land around the Grand Canyon for mining and exploitation of other resources.

Expanding on the anti-federal government theme, Steve Williamson focused on HB 2815 which would allow taxpayers to apply for tax credits equivalent to the cost of adhering to laws imposing excessive regulation. In other words, if you have to comply with a federal law regulating pollution, you presumably could apply for tax credits to repay you for the compliance. This bill is one of the conservative Goldwater Institute’s contributions to the legislative agenda.

Chuck Williamson addressed the bills that would further cut into education by saying, “If you look at states that have the best business, they are all high-tax states that have seed money available, good education, and applicable expertise. That’s why they often locate near college campuses. Good businesses don’t move for a low tax rate. The businesses that do are like call centers that cause you to compete with countries like India. That’s the exact opposite of what’s needed. We need to create small businesses that grow and create good jobs. The way to help business is to have well-educated people for them to hire.”

Dick Searle chose to talk about bills which would allow more mining in the Grand Canyon. “There is no real ban on mining in the Grand Canyon now,” said Dick. “There are already 2,000 mining claims in the area. Thanks to an 1872 mining law, foreign companies are extracting the resources and paying virtually nothing in return. I’m really concerned about the future of the environment.”

Bill pointed out that many of these bills are intended to reinterpret clauses in the Constitution that conservatives don’t like. “They want to give states supremacy over the federal government,” he said. “If I were a judge looking at the Bible bill, the intent seems to mandate religious instruction that’s useful for only a portion of the population.”

Of course, there are self-serving bills such as HB 2557 which redefines intersections. The bill was pushed by Republican Senator Frank Antenori after he received a ticket for deliberately running a red light.

SB 1231 sponsored by Senate President Steve Pierce, appropriates $250,000 to allow the state Attorney General to sue the US Forest Service for the lack of forest thinning.

And, in a new development, the legislature has passed HB 2729 to allow guns in all public buildings unless the building owner provides a guard, metal detector and gun lockers at each entrance. Looking at the consequences for just one county, if Maricopa wants to keep guns out of its buildings, it will cost $11.3 million for equipment and $19.5 million in ongoing costs.

Also, Gov. Jan Brewer has signed legislation making it a crime for a doctor to perform an abortion at or beyond 20 weeks. Doctors who violate the law could not only lose their medical licenses but also be sent to jail for up to six months.

For all of the sordid details about this legislative session, visit www.azleg.gov/bills.asp.

 

Posted in Arizona Politics, Government | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on More Than Enough Craziness To Go Around.

Democratic Perspective’s First Anniversary — Podcast April 9, 2012


The Republican Wrecking Crew:  Not surprisingly, people who don’t believe in government aren’t very good at governing. On Democratic Perspective’s first anniversary show, co-hosts Mike Cosentino and Steve Williamson are joined by VVID members Gary LaMaster, Dick Searle, Bill Timberman and Chuck Williamson in a dissection of some of our favorite bad bills from the Republican-dominated Arizona State Legislature. If you can laugh at horror movies, folks, this is the show for you.

Posted in Arizona Politics, Economic Policy, Education, Environment, Podcasts | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Democratic Perspective’s First Anniversary — Podcast April 9, 2012

Reclaiming the Sedona Fire District Board — Podcast April 2, 2012


A Matter of Trust:  On Democratic Perspective’s inaugural half-hour show, Sedona Fire District Board candidates Corrie Cooperman, Nazih Hazime and Diane Schoen discuss their disappointments with current Board policies, and speak about what they would do to bring more responsible management to the District. Their opponents, who were elected in 2010 on a platform of fiscal responsibility, have instead spent tens of thousands of dollars on an unnecessary audit, undermined public confidence in the professionals who run the Fire Department, and embraced cost-cutting measures which could ultimately endanger public safety. It’s time for a change.

Posted in Arizona Politics, Government, Interviews, Podcasts | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Reclaiming the Sedona Fire District Board — Podcast April 2, 2012

Reclaiming The Sedona Fire District Board.

For its very first half hour program on KAZM-AM, Democratic Perspective chose to host Sedona Fire Board candidates Corrie Cooperman, Nazih Hazime and Diane Schoen.

To understand this election, you first need to know a little history. In 2008, two Board members were elected on a platform of fiscal responsibility. Then, in 2010, two Tea Party candidates also promising fiscal responsibility won seats on the Board.

Almost immediately, problems surfaced based on their ideology and apparent distrust of people who work for the public. The Board is accused of violating open meeting laws, destroying department morale and compromising quality of first responders. Moreover, instead of saving money, the Board has squandered it by ordering a forensic audit and racking up tens of thousands in legal bills.

As a result, Cooperman, Hazime and Schoen are facing off against Dave Blauert, Charles Christenson, and Phyllis Erick in a recall election.

We began our conversation by asking the candidates to say a little about themselves and why they’re running for offic. The first to respond was Chief Nazih Hazime who is running against Charles Christenson. “I ran for Fire Chief and was chosen as the result of a $10,000 process and served two years as the Sedona Fire Chief,” said Hazime. “I think it only makes sense to have someone with fire-fighting experience on the Board.”

Diane Schoen responded by saying she’s running against Fire Board Chairman, Dave Blauert. Schoen described herself as an Arizona native who has lived in Sedona for 9 years. “I’ve served on a school board and on a public commission. I’m currently President of the Jewish Community of Sedona,” she said. “I’m running because the current Board members do not listen to the community. The democratic process is important to me.”

Last, Corey Cooperman stated that she is running against Phyllis Erick. “I am concerned quality is eroding,” Cooperman said. “I am a Registered Nurse concerned that the Board wants to privatize ambulance service. Quality will go down. We want well-trained people to respond.”

As previously stated, money is one of the primary reasons for the recall. Following the resignation of Chief Hazime, the Fire Board is accused of spending $30,000 to select a new chief and choosing the most expensive bid for the forensic audit, awarding the job to McCladery at a cost of $190,000. (Incidentally, McCladery had never before audited a fire department.)

“The board is quoted as saying the books had been cooked,” said Schoen. “Yet the audit confirmed that the department was adequately staffed and equipped. No wrongdoing was found.”

“If you think something is wrong, you should work with the Chief,” added Hazime. “There were some things that needed to be done. There were some personnel issues. Some staff and equipment needed to be eliminated. But they should have let the Chief take care of it.”
Instead, the Board ignored Chief Hazime and refused to communicate with him.

“The Board micro-managed,” said Schoen. “They did a research project without telling the current Chief. You hire a professional to run the organization. You are a policy board. Is it any wonder morale is very low.”

“We have lost a Fire Marshall, the head of H.R., and the Finance Manager,” added Cooperman. “Those people were hired almost immediately by other departments. Chief Hazime was hired within weeks by the Verde Valley Fire Department.” But even though Hazime now serves with the VVFD, he notes, “I’m Verde Valley Fire Chief, but a Sedona resident. I feel my work wasn’t finished. To come back and serve would be an honor.”

“I became more interested as money was being spent,” said Schoen. Cooperman agreed, “The red flag for me was privatizing the ambulance service. Then I started going to meetings. The legal costs have been $140,000,” she said. “The typical cost should be $45,000 per year. The attorney of 27 years has been fired because they didn’t like his advice. Now they want to spend $120,000 for a fingerprint system to clock in and out. I checked it out and it’s the kind of system that’s usually only used by casinos,” she concluded.

Mailing of early ballots will begin April 19. The election will be completed on May 15. You’ll find more information on the subject at the following websites:

http://www.sfdrecall.com/sfdrecall/__Home_Page.html

http://thesedonacitizen.com/fire-board-election-2012/

Posted in Arizona Politics, Government, Interviews | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Reclaiming The Sedona Fire District Board.

Paul Lenze Interview — Podcast March 26, 2012


The Last Resort: Middle-East expert Dr. Paul Lenze, of Northern Arizona University, talks with Democratic Perspective co-hosts Michael Cosentino and Stephen Williamson about the consequences of military actions against Iran, consequences which have often been overlooked or downplayed by powerful advocates in the Republican Party, in the Israeli government, and in its allied lobbying groups in the U.S.

Despite what many of our fellow citizens seem to believe, war is never the first tool a government should reach for when its interests are thwarted, even when its military is the most powerful in the world. If what happened in Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan was not enough to convince U.S. decision makers that wars of choice are a bad idea, there’s a good chance that Iran will be next on the list for military action. If so, Dr. Lenze argues that the consequences may once again be worse than we bargained for.

Posted in Foreign Affairs, Government, Interviews, Middle East, Military, National Politics, Podcasts | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Paul Lenze Interview — Podcast March 26, 2012