Voter ID Laws: The Latest Attempt To Disenfranchise Voters.

Democratic Perspective recently addressed the issue of GOP-backed voter ID laws which have been introduced in 34 states. Among other things, these new laws require a voter to provide a current photo ID in order to exercise his or her constitutional right to vote.
It seems logical enough.

Yet studies show that this simple requirement may disenfranchise millions of voters. Those who do not drive, the elderly, those who have recently moved, and others may find the effort to obtain a state-approved photo ID too difficult, too expensive or simply not worth the effort.

Republicans argue that voter ID laws will prevent voter fraud. That might be true if voter fraud at the polls were an actual problem. But voter fraud is little more than a GOP myth. It hasn’t happened for a very long time. Only a handful of cases have been confirmed in recent decades; likely because the penalties include up to 5 years in federal prison and a $10,000 fine in addition to state penalties for each act of voter fraud.

Of course, some voter fraud does exist – just not at the polls. Instead, it occurs with absentee ballots or it takes the form of ballot box stuffing. The new voter ID laws will not affect that.

But the truth hasn’t stopped the flood of GOP-backed voter laws. Last year, Georgia passed voter ID requirements despite the fact that the former Secretary Of State could not recall a single case of voter impersonation during her time in office.

Of course, the GOP points to rumors and a few examples of invalid voter registrations collected by ACORN for fictitious characters such as Mickey Mouse and Donald Duck. But these are not examples of voter fraud. Since Mickey Mouse was never allowed to vote, the actual fraud was committed against ACORN, which paid people to collect registrations.

So why does the GOP continue to push these new laws despite abundant evidence to the contrary? The motivation seems obvious – to supress the votes of African-Americans, Latinos, college students and others who are likely to vote for President Obama in the coming election. This type of voter suppression hearkens back to the days of literacy tests and poll taxes.

Taking a look at just one of these groups, college students often have a new address every school year; sometimes every semester, making it difficult for them to maintain a current ID. So laws requiring a photo ID with a current address could have a large impact on them.  (Not coincidentally, college students overwhelmingly supported Obama in 2008.)

Another group that has been disenfranchised consists of felons. In some states, convicted felons are denied the right to vote even after they’ve served their time and paid their debt to society. For example, in Arizona, felons have to petition to restore their voting rights. Most of these people are non-violent and many simply made one bad decision. Of the 5.3 million felons in the US, more than 50 percent are non-violent drug offenders.

Not surprisingly, this coordinated effort is being led by ALEC (American Legislative Exchange Council). ALEC has authored a variety of bills that seem designed to affect voter turnout within certain populations. Among other things, these bills require photo IDs and proof of citizenship. Some change requirements for voter registration drives. Others eliminate same day registration and reduce the number of days for early voting.

A study by the Brennan Center for Justice estimates that these laws will suppress more than 5 million votes. If true, our very democracy could be at stake. To quote Lyndon B. Johnson at the time he signed the Civil Rights Act into law, voting is “the basic right, without which all others are meaningless.”

Posted in Elections, National Politics | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Voter ID Laws: The Latest Attempt To Disenfranchise Voters.

Government for Sale — Podcast February 13, 2012


Government for Sale: The Wholesaling of Political Influence. Democratic Perspective co-hosts Michael Cosentino and Steve Williamson discuss the proliferation of lobbyists in Washington, D.C. and in our statehouses., and what they are buying with their employers’ money.

Posted in Arizona Politics, Campaign Finance, Dark Money, Elections, Front Organizations, Government, National Politics, Podcasts | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Government for Sale — Podcast February 13, 2012

Government For Sale.

On February 13th, Democratic Perspective co-hosts, Steve Williamson and Mike Cosentino continued their series on the influence of money in politics. They began by listing a few eye-opening statistics:

$3.5 billion is spent on lobbying each year. (And that’s just the “above board” lobbying that can be tracked.) There are more than 13,000 registered lobbyists in the U.S. And there are six health care lobbyists for every elected official.

Of course, many, including a majority of Supreme Court justices, argue that the money spent on lobbying and campaign contributions is free speech. But we all know the effects of such spending.

For example, 98 percent of the people elected to the House of Representatives and 88 percent of those elected to the Senate outspent their opponents. In 2008, it has been estimated that $2.4 billion was spent on the presidential election and another $2.9 billion was spent on Congressional elections.

Money has changed everything. Lobbying has perverted the legislative system and steered power away from constituents to large organizations and industries who can afford to buy influence through lobbyists and campaign contributions.

Jack Abramoff, the former Washington lobbyist who was convicted of mail fraud and conspiracy, has written Capitol Punishment, a book on corruption and the influence of lobbying. Appearing on 60 Minutes on CBS, Abramoff told Leslie Stahl that bribery is “done every day and it’s still being done.” He said the surest method was the promise of future, high-paying jobs to the top staffers of Congressional representatives. “Now the moment I said that to them or any of our staff said that to them, that was it. We owned them. … Every request … of our clients, everything that we want, they’re going to do. Not only that, they’re going to think of things we can’t think of to do.”

Abramoff has also been quoted as saying, “Access is vital in lobbying. If you can’t get in the door, you can’t make your case. Here we had a hostile senator, whose staff was hostile, and we had to get in. So that’s the lobbyist safe-cracker method … throw fundraisers, raise money, and become a big donor.”

A particularly sorry example of the influence by lobbyists on federal legislation took place during the vote for TARP (Troubled Asset Relief Program) that bailed out the “too-big-to-fail” financial institutions. To sway some of the members of Congress who voted against the bill, lobbyists proposed a number of sweetners such as earmarks for Puerto Rican rum and NASCAR.

Of course, there are many similar examples in state government. Groups like ALEC (American Legislative Exchange Council) which is funded by the infamous Koch brothers also pervert the system. As we’ve explained before, ALEC writes legislation on behalf of its conservative sponsors then searches for legislators willing to introduce the bills in their statehouses. Just this past year, 50 ALEC-created bills were introduced by Florida legislators. In addition, dozens were introduced in Arizona, Virginia and Ohio. And, in case you’re wondering, nothing like ALEC exists on the left.

Another such conservative organization is Arizona’s own Goldwater Institute which has written all of the anti-union legislation being introduced in the Arizona legislature.

Also in Arizona, some of Governor Jan Brewer’s aides and political allies have been tied to the private prison industry. Is it just coincidence, then that more private prisons are being built in Arizona despite the fact that they cost the state more per prisoner than public prisons?

Perhaps that’s why AZ House minority leader, Chad Campbell, recently concluded that Jan Brewer does nothing that doesn’t benefit Jan Brewer.

If you’d like to learn more, visit the following websites:
http://alecwatch.org/
http://www.opensecrets.org/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lobbying_in_the_United_States

Posted in Arizona Politics, Campaign Finance, Dark Money, Elections, Front Organizations, Government, National Politics | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Government For Sale.

Dean Baker Interview, Part 2 — Podcast February 6, 2012


“The Game Was Rigged”: What the 1% Was Really Up To. In the second part of his interview with Democratic Perspective, Dean Baker talks about who benefits from current economic policies, and what we might do to make them work more in the public interest.

Posted in Economic Policy, Fiscal Policy, Government, Interviews, National Politics, Podcasts, Taxes and the Deficit | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Dean Baker Interview, Part 2 — Podcast February 6, 2012

More On The Economy With Dean Baker.

Democratic Perspective continued its discussion with acclaimed economist, Dean Baker by asking about the current debate over taxation of the wealthy.

“Progressives need a new approach to politics,” he replied. “Most of the public debate is conservatives want to leave things to the free market. Progressives want fairness. The game was rigged. They rigged the deck to funnel money to the one percent. Why did we let them structure the market that way?”

Turning to the housing bubble, Baker said, “Wall Street banks stuffed their pockets through the housing bubble. They either knew what they were doing was fraudulent or they failed to realize the risk. Then the government bailed them out. But it’s different for small businesses. They don’t get bailed out if they fail.”

When asked about the current state of the housing market, Baker said, “There’s a ways left to go; lots of excess supply of housing. I wouldn’t expect prices to go lower, but I wouldn’t expect new construction until 2013-2014.”

Maintaining our theme about the economy being rigged to benefit the wealthy, we asked about corporations using the patent system to take advantage of government investment in medical research. Baker responded by saying, “We need to set up an alternate mechanism. We pay roughly $300 billion a year for prescription drugs that would sell for $30 billion a year without patent protection. I’d like to see medical research publicly financed and the results put into public domain rather than the current patent system.”

Asked about the nation’s economic future and unemployment, Baker said, “The near to mid-term prospects are really bad. It could be 2020 until we get back to full employment at the current rate of job growth.”

Dean Baker writes a weekly commentary on the economy which is available on his blog, Beat The Press hosted by the Center for Economic and Policy Research, http://www.cepr.net/. In addition, Mr. Baker’s op-ed on the national debt is available at Nation of Change.org.

Posted in Economic Policy, Fiscal Policy, Government, Interviews, National Politics, Taxes and the Deficit | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on More On The Economy With Dean Baker.

An Expert’s View Of Our Economy.

Following President Obama’s State of The Union address, Democratic Perspective invited Dean Baker to discuss the economy.

A highly respected macro-economist and co-founder of the Center for Economic and Policy Research, Baker writes a weekly commentary on the economy which is available on his blog, Beat The Press. He was among the first to raise concerns about a bubble in the housing market beginning in 2002 and he has written extensively about the bubble economy. He is also consultant to the joint economic committee for Congress.

We began our interview by asking Mr. Baker where we are now. “The economy fell off a cliff,” he responded. “We lost 7 million jobs and we’re now 10 million jobs behind where we should be. There is very weak growth and a huge backlog of unemployed. The reduction of unemployed is due almost entirely to people giving up looking for work. It’s a really bad picture. Lots of people are suffering.”

Baker continued, “The Larry Summers memo recently released in a New York Times article shows the administration was way too optimistic. They were given erroneous information. Unemployment went to 10.5 percent before the stimulus took effect.”
“President Obama should have said the stimulus was a good start, but we’re going to need more,” said Baker. “Unfortunately, he began to focus on deficit reduction, instead.” He believes that will make it difficult for the president to earn a second term. “No president has been re-elected with 8.5 percent unemployment since Franklin Roosevelt,” he said.

When asked about Republican statements that the stimulus failed, Baker responded, “There is a lot of research on the stimulus. It all points to the creation of 2.3 million jobs. The president has done a poor job of explaining that.”

“The loss of jobs all happened before he took office in the fall of 2008 and the beginning of 2009,” he continued. “The stimulus was not large enough and was never expected to do more.”

In regard to Republican demands for large cuts to reduce the deficit, Baker responded, “The Republican argument is ridiculous. How much evidence do I have to beat you up with? Austerity has deepened the recession in the countries that have tried it.”
As for claims that the government can’t create jobs, Baker said, “That’s ridiculous. How is cutting teachers going to create jobs in business?”

Turning to the controversy over capital gains taxes, Baker said, “The big cut was under Bush. He cut the rate from 20 percent to 15 percent. By comparison, the rate was 28 percent under Reagan. Why should you pay a lower rate on earnings from investment?” he asked. “Why should it be lower than the tax rate on ordinary income? I don’t understand why.”

Posted in Economic Policy, Economic Stimulus, Elections, Fiscal Policy, Government, Interviews, Monetary Policy, National Politics, Taxes and the Deficit | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on An Expert’s View Of Our Economy.

Dean Baker Interview — Podcast January 30, 2011


Unemployment, Economic Stimulus, and the Deficit: In an exclusive interview with Democratic Perspective, progressive economist Dean Baker, co-founder and co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research, discusses what has happened to the U.S. economy since the collapse of Lehman Brothers in 2008 — the policy debate, the stimulus, the real unemployment rate, and where we are today, nine months before the next Presidential election.

Posted in Economic Policy, Economic Stimulus, Fiscal Policy, Government, Interviews, Monetary Policy, National Politics, Podcasts, Unemployment | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Dean Baker Interview — Podcast January 30, 2011

Following the Money: PACs and Their Effects — Podcast January 23, 2012


Following the Money: The Influence of Political Action Committees on Our Politics and Legislation. Democratic Perspective’s co-hosts, Mike Cosentino and Steve Williamson, look at Political Action Committees (PACs) — what they are, who funds them, and what kinds of distortions they can introduce into our laws as well as our political campaigns.

Posted in Arizona Politics, Campaign Finance, Elections, Front Organizations, Government, National Politics, Paul Gosar, Podcasts, Political Action Committees, Political Contributions, Special Interest Legislation | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Following the Money: PACs and Their Effects — Podcast January 23, 2012

Money. Money. And More Money.

This week, Democratic Perspective continued our “Follow the Money” series on PACs (Political Action Committees) and Super Pacs. To illustrate the problem, we chose to focus on contributions to Congressman Paul Gosar since he is currently our representative.

Under current laws, PACs can give $5,000 to a candidate each year. And in 2010, Gosar received $354,647 from PACs.

PACs may be broken into two categories: Industry and professional organizations which are limited to donations of $5,000 per candidate per year, and Leadership PACs.

Among the industry and professional PACs that gave money to Gosar are the American Dental Association which gives 28 percent to Democrats and 72 percent to Republicans and the American College of Radiology which gives slightly more to Democrats. Gosar also received money from four other dental groups.

Gosar received more than $16,000 from leadership PACs in 2010. According to OpenSecrets.org, “Leadership PACs are those of established Congressional representatives. Leadership PACs are designed for two things: “to make money and to make friends. Leadership PACs provide a way for candidates to fund travel, office expenses, consultants, polling and other non-campaign expenses. They can also be used to fund other candidates’ campaigns, usually new candidates or threatened incumbents.”

Leadership PACs that contributed to Gosar included the Every Republican Is Crucial PAC, the GOP Generation Y Fund, the Freedom Project, the Liberty Project, Invest In A Strong & Secure America , Prosperity PAC, and SarahPAC, the PAC created by Sarah Palin. (Not coincidentally, Gosar hired many of her staff to work in his office.)

Other contributors to Gosar’s 2010 campaign included California Portland Cement Company, the National Restaurant Association (likely because Gosar is anti-union).

Of all of Paul Gosar’s contributors, the largest and one of the most interesting was Services Group of America which gave more than $42,000 to Gosar’s 2010 campaign. The company’s CEO, Thomas J. Stewart, was originally from Seattle but moved to Arizona in 2005. Stewart inherited the Seattle Stevedore Company from his father and, by 1984, his company controlled shipping in every port on the West Coast from San Diego to Anchorage. He quickly became the largest political contributor from Washington – giving only to Republicans.

Stewart faced $62,000 in civil penalties for an illegal contribution of $32,850 from Services Group of America to a 1995 ballot measure to change the way Seattle City Council members are elected. And, in 1998, Stewart was fined $5 million for illegal contributions to Congressional campaigns. It was found that he funneled illegal contributions to Republican candidates through his employees, giving bonuses to employees for slipping money into campaigns.

Stewart developed strong ties to Arizona, changing his residency to Arizona in April 2005. He moved his company here a year later. He, his wife and young daughter and his long-time pilot, were killed in a Cave Creek helicopter crash in early 2010.

In 2012, the PAC created by Services Group of America has already given $18,000 to Republican candidates for federal office.

Posted in Arizona Politics, Citizens United, Dark Money, Elections, National Politics, Paul Gosar, Political Action Committees, Political Contributions | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Money. Money. And More Money.

James Ledbetter Interview, Part 2 — Podcast January 16, 2012


Independents, Education and Healthcare: In the second part of Democratic Perspective’s interview with James Ledbetter, we focus on the role of independent voters in Arizona, education funding, and his experience on the Governor’s Health Care Task Force.

Posted in Arizona Budget, Arizona Politics, Education, Health Care, Interviews, Podcasts | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on James Ledbetter Interview, Part 2 — Podcast January 16, 2012